From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org, GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Gdb generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 20:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0412311512420.6844@dberlin.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041231201127.GA4344@lucon.org>
>
> This patch seems to generate better debug info.
You missed a whole bunch of cases where we are arbitrarily passing true to
mem_loc_descriptor or loc_descriptor.
You also *can* generate a frame base for the testcase you sent me, we just
don't use all the info we could to generate it.
See the last patch i sent you which adds code to the
add_location_or_const_value_attribute routine.
Also, whether we generate a frame_base has *nothing* to do with the
setting of TREE_PUBLIC.
The code says:
else if (!DECL_EXTERNAL (decl))
{
....
/* Define the "frame base" location for this routine. We use the
frame pointer or stack pointer registers, since the RTL for local
variables is relative to one of them. */
if (frame_base_decl && lookup_decl_loc (frame_base_decl) != NULL)
{
add_location_or_const_value_attribute (subr_die,
frame_base_decl,
DW_AT_frame_base);
}
else
{
fp_reg
= frame_pointer_needed ? hard_frame_pointer_rtx :
stack_pointer_rtx;
add_AT_loc (subr_die, DW_AT_frame_base, reg_loc_descriptor
(fp_reg));
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-31 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-22 1:16 Is this a gcc, gdb or readelf bug? H. J. Lu
2004-12-22 11:09 ` Nick Clifton
2004-12-22 18:25 ` H. J. Lu
2004-12-23 3:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-30 19:24 ` GDB 6.3 assumes that DW_AT_frame_base exists H. J. Lu
2004-12-30 19:36 ` H. J. Lu
2004-12-30 19:56 ` H. J. Lu
2004-12-30 20:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-30 20:23 ` Gdb generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base H. J. Lu
2004-12-30 20:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-30 20:52 ` Gdb generates DW_OP_fbreg in " H. J. Lu
2004-12-30 20:56 ` Gdb generates " Daniel Berlin
2004-12-30 21:05 ` H. J. Lu
2004-12-31 0:35 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-12-31 19:57 ` H. J. Lu
2004-12-31 20:09 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-12-31 20:11 ` H. J. Lu
2004-12-31 20:16 ` Daniel Berlin [this message]
[not found] ` <20041231163806.GA1335@lucon.org>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.60.0412311158280.27590@dberlin.org>
[not found] ` <20041231184405.GA2182@lucon.org>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.60.0412311451060.6844@dberlin.org>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.60.0412311509360.6844@dberlin.org>
[not found] ` <20041231215010.GA5722@lucon.org>
[not found] ` <20041231215443.GA5853@lucon.org>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.60.0412311656360.6844@dberlin.org>
[not found] ` <20041231220324.GA5987@lucon.org>
2005-01-01 19:15 ` gcc 4.0 " H. J. Lu
2005-01-01 20:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-01-01 20:50 ` Daniel Berlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.60.0412311512420.6844@dberlin.org \
--to=dberlin@dberlin.org \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=hjl@lucon.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox