From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29181 invoked by alias); 1 Jan 2005 20:09:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28902 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2005 20:09:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 Jan 2005 20:09:52 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CkpZJ-00084b-9W; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 15:09:45 -0500 Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 20:09:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: "H. J. Lu" Cc: Daniel Berlin , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, GDB Subject: Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base Message-ID: <20050101200945.GA30989@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: "H. J. Lu" , Daniel Berlin , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, GDB References: <20041231163806.GA1335@lucon.org> <20041231184405.GA2182@lucon.org> <20041231215010.GA5722@lucon.org> <20041231215443.GA5853@lucon.org> <20041231220324.GA5987@lucon.org> <20050101191459.GA23014@lucon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050101191459.GA23014@lucon.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 11:15:00AM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote: > The modified patch works with tls_symbolic_operand in i386. However, > I do see > > <2><427491>: Abbrev Number: 39 (DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine) > DW_AT_sibling : <427510> > DW_AT_abstract_origin: <427159> > DW_AT_low_pc : 0x8399aea > DW_AT_high_pc : 0x8399b3c > <3><4274a2>: Abbrev Number: 37 (DW_TAG_formal_parameter) > DW_AT_abstract_origin: <42716b> > <3><4274a7>: Abbrev Number: 37 (DW_TAG_formal_parameter) > DW_AT_abstract_origin: <427177> Do the abstract origins have locations? Otherwise, that's a problem... -- Daniel Jacobowitz