* The VAX
@ 2004-04-12 16:43 Mark Kettenis
2004-04-12 17:39 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Kettenis @ 2004-04-12 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
I've successfully installed NetBSD 1.6.1 on a VAX simulator. The
performance is actually quite reasonable on my AMD64 box. It is
currently compiling GDB.
Anyway, I'm working on GDB's VAX target. Hopefully I'll have a
working native NetBSD/vax configuration soon. I'm already working on
frameifying vax-tdep.c. So stay tuned, and don't throw away the
current VAX stuff just yet...
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: The VAX
2004-04-12 16:43 The VAX Mark Kettenis
@ 2004-04-12 17:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-12 19:00 ` Mark Kettenis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2004-04-12 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Kettenis, Jason R Thorpe; +Cc: gdb
> I've successfully installed NetBSD 1.6.1 on a VAX simulator. The
> performance is actually quite reasonable on my AMD64 box. It is
> currently compiling GDB.
>
> Anyway, I'm working on GDB's VAX target. Hopefully I'll have a
> working native NetBSD/vax configuration soon. I'm already working on
> frameifying vax-tdep.c. So stay tuned, and don't throw away the
> current VAX stuff just yet...
Been there, done that. Per my earlier e-mails, NetBSD/VAX GDB doesn't
build - the nat code is simply missing.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: The VAX
2004-04-12 17:39 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2004-04-12 19:00 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-04-12 21:25 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Kettenis @ 2004-04-12 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cagney; +Cc: thorpej, gdb
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 12:42:58 -0400
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
> I've successfully installed NetBSD 1.6.1 on a VAX simulator. The
> performance is actually quite reasonable on my AMD64 box. It is
> currently compiling GDB.
>
> Anyway, I'm working on GDB's VAX target. Hopefully I'll have a
> working native NetBSD/vax configuration soon. I'm already working on
> frameifying vax-tdep.c. So stay tuned, and don't throw away the
> current VAX stuff just yet...
Been there, done that. Per my earlier e-mails, NetBSD/VAX GDB doesn't
build - the nat code is simply missing.
I've got a working NetBSD/vax GDB now. The BSD-specific nat code is
already checked in :-). I just need to tweak the config files, but I
don't want to do that now since that'll probably mean I'll have to
rebuild everything, which is a bit time-consuming. I'll do that when
I'm finished rewriting the code in vax-tdep.c.
In the mean time, would it be a problem if frameifying the VAX would
nuke signal trampoline handling on Ultrix? Not that I expect it to be
working...
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: The VAX
2004-04-12 19:00 ` Mark Kettenis
@ 2004-04-12 21:25 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2004-04-12 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Kettenis; +Cc: thorpej, gdb
> In the mean time, would it be a problem if frameifying the VAX would
> nuke signal trampoline handling on Ultrix? Not that I expect it to be
> working...
That isn't a problem. As shown by the MIPS (and HP/PA?) test results for:
frame-signal >better-than> noframe+signal
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-04-12 19:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-04-12 16:43 The VAX Mark Kettenis
2004-04-12 17:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-12 19:00 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-04-12 21:25 ` Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox