From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-17848-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 19048 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2004 19:00:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 18894 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2004 19:00:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Apr 2004 19:00:31 -0000
Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 675FA2B9C; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:00:24 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <407AE748.1040908@gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 21:25:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
Cc: thorpej@wasabisystems.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: The VAX
References: <200404121545.i3CFjD7N026735@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <407AC712.9020702@gnu.org> <200404121738.i3CHcfal032199@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <200404121738.i3CHcfal032199@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00066.txt.bz2

> In the mean time, would it be a problem if frameifying the VAX would
> nuke signal trampoline handling on Ultrix?  Not that I expect it to be
> working...

That isn't a problem.  As shown by the MIPS (and HP/PA?) test results for:
	frame-signal >better-than> noframe+signal
Andrew