Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Sunil Alankar <sunil.alankar@coware.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB 5.2/5.3 breakpoint bug
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 18:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030108181548.GA27461@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030108173931.GB22279@nevyn.them.org>

On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 12:39:31PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 03:49:31PM -0800, Sunil Alankar wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > While debugging this in function, find_pc_sect_line (CORE_ADDR pc, struct
> > sec *section, int notcurrent)
> > I found there were two line items in a line table with the same value of PC.
> > First one gets picked as the best match. But this had item->line == 0. The
> > next line item with the same value for item->pc, but a valid item->line ( >
> > 0) does not get picked as the best match.
> > I put in the following check to correct this. My question is,
> > Is it valid to have have more than one line item with same value faor PC and
> > possibly 0 for line in one of them? What causes this?
> > Would this be an appropriate fix? Or is the problem more deep rooted in
> > creating the symbol table?
> 
> When this happens, are the two lines in different files?

I just can't get this to happen.  If two items in a row have the same
PC, we should never be picking the first of the two.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


  reply	other threads:[~2003-01-08 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <IMEGIEBLGLIOEGOLAFIEGELNCEAA.sunil.alankar@coware.com>
2003-01-05 23:10 ` Sunil Alankar
2003-01-05 23:14   ` Sunil Alankar
2003-01-07 23:55     ` Sunil Alankar
2003-01-08  0:52       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-08 17:39       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-08 18:16         ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-01-08 19:22           ` Sunil Alankar
2003-01-08 19:32             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-08 19:43               ` Sunil Alankar
2003-01-08 20:42                 ` Sunil Alankar
2003-01-08 20:46                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-08 22:46                     ` Ching Lai
2003-01-09  3:40                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-09  5:18                         ` Ching Lai
2003-01-08 17:30   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-08 18:14     ` Sunil Alankar
2003-01-08 18:24       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-29  3:56       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-02 20:59 how to access show/set data Kris Warkentin
2003-01-04  2:19 ` GDB 5.2/5.3 breakpoint bug Sunil Alankar
2003-01-04  2:23   ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030108181548.GA27461@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=sunil.alankar@coware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox