From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Ching Lai <ching@coware.com>
Cc: Nafees <nafees@coware.com>,
gdb@sources.redhat.com, Cesar Quiroz <Cesar.Quiroz@coware.com>,
Sunil Alankar <salankar@coware.com>
Subject: Re: GDB 5.2/5.3 breakpoint bug
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 03:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030109034002.GC10532@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00c201c2b767$a1b01060$d401a8c0@notebook>
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 02:45:23PM -0800, Ching Lai wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> > > Comment out the line 2753 in gdb 5.21 and 2777 in gdb 5.3 and build
> them
> > on
> > > solaris seems to work OK with two test cases.
> > >
> > > Now the question is to figure out why this line is added in gdb 5.21
> and
> > > gdb 5.3?
> >
> > The line is supposed to be there; it's so we know what is and isn't
> > inside a function. You need to explain better why it's causing a
> > problem in find_pc_sect_line.
>
> The problem is the linetable in different symbol tables have the
> same pc address in my testcase. One has valid number and the other one
> with line number as 0 (which is added by the extra record_line()).
>
> In gdb 5.2.1 release of find_pc_set_line in symtab.c file.
>
> 1788 /* Is this file's best line closer than the best in the other
> files?
> 1789 If so, record this file, and its best line, as best so far.
> */
> 1790
> 1791 if (prev && (!best || prev->pc > best->pc))
> 1792 {
> 1793 best = prev;
> 1794 best_symtab = s;
> 1795
> 1796 /* Discard BEST_END if it's before the PC of the current
> BEST. */
> 1797 if (best_end <= best->pc)
> 1798 best_end = 0;
> 1799 }
>
> Since the line 1791 prev->pc with valid line number is not greater than
> best->pc
> which has 0 as line number, so it did not pick up the correct symbol file.
>
> If the record_line is need in gdb 5.2.1 and gdb 5.3, then the line 1791
> might
> need an extra condition to void picking up the wrong symbol table which has
> line
> number as 0 as added by record_line().
>
> 1791 if (prev && (!best || prev->pc > best->pc) && (prev->line != 0))
>
>
> Here are the debugging section of my observation.
Thanks for the extra detail. I see what's going on now; I believe this
patch should also avoid the problem. Does it?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
2002-03-08 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
* symtab.c (find_pc_sect_line): Don't consider end-of-function
lines.
Index: symtab.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/symtab.c,v
retrieving revision 1.84
diff -u -p -r1.84 symtab.c
--- symtab.c 2 Jan 2003 14:27:26 -0000 1.84
+++ symtab.c 9 Jan 2003 03:38:36 -0000
@@ -2012,9 +2012,11 @@ find_pc_sect_line (CORE_ADDR pc, struct
the first line, prev will not be set. */
/* Is this file's best line closer than the best in the other files?
- If so, record this file, and its best line, as best so far. */
+ If so, record this file, and its best line, as best so far. Don't
+ save prev if it represents the end of a function (i.e. line number
+ 0) instead of a real line. */
- if (prev && (!best || prev->pc > best->pc))
+ if (prev && prev->line && (!best || prev->pc > best->pc))
{
best = prev;
best_symtab = s;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-09 3:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <IMEGIEBLGLIOEGOLAFIEGELNCEAA.sunil.alankar@coware.com>
2003-01-05 23:10 ` Sunil Alankar
2003-01-05 23:14 ` Sunil Alankar
2003-01-07 23:55 ` Sunil Alankar
2003-01-08 0:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-08 17:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-08 18:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-08 19:22 ` Sunil Alankar
2003-01-08 19:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-08 19:43 ` Sunil Alankar
2003-01-08 20:42 ` Sunil Alankar
2003-01-08 20:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-08 22:46 ` Ching Lai
2003-01-09 3:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-01-09 5:18 ` Ching Lai
2003-01-08 17:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-08 18:14 ` Sunil Alankar
2003-01-08 18:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-29 3:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-02 20:59 how to access show/set data Kris Warkentin
2003-01-04 2:19 ` GDB 5.2/5.3 breakpoint bug Sunil Alankar
2003-01-04 2:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030109034002.GC10532@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=Cesar.Quiroz@coware.com \
--cc=ching@coware.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=nafees@coware.com \
--cc=salankar@coware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox