* Always multi-arch the SPARC, dump sparclet?
@ 2002-11-25 13:17 Andrew Cagney
2002-11-25 13:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-11-25 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
Hello,
The SPARC target has a number of variants that don't yet build with
multi-arch enabled (e.g., sparc-elf).
I'd like to propose that the switch simply be thrown and any
non-multi-arch code be ripped out. Acceptance criteria for such a
change being simply `it still builds'.
This shouldn't affect things like GNU/Linux, which, I believe, do
already build with multi-arch enabled.
This will, however, affect non-nulti-arch SPARC targets such as the
sparclet potentially leading to breakage.
Thoughts?
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Always multi-arch the SPARC, dump sparclet?
2002-11-25 13:17 Always multi-arch the SPARC, dump sparclet? Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-11-25 13:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-11-25 13:28 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-11-25 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 04:17:51PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The SPARC target has a number of variants that don't yet build with
> multi-arch enabled (e.g., sparc-elf).
>
> I'd like to propose that the switch simply be thrown and any
> non-multi-arch code be ripped out. Acceptance criteria for such a
> change being simply `it still builds'.
>
> This shouldn't affect things like GNU/Linux, which, I believe, do
> already build with multi-arch enabled.
>
> This will, however, affect non-nulti-arch SPARC targets such as the
> sparclet potentially leading to breakage.
>
> Thoughts?
How's Solaris affected? That's the only SPARC target that sees real
use lately.
Not that it seems to work very well.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Always multi-arch the SPARC, dump sparclet?
2002-11-25 13:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2002-11-25 13:28 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-11-25 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: gdb
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 04:17:51PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The SPARC target has a number of variants that don't yet build with
>> multi-arch enabled (e.g., sparc-elf).
>>
>> I'd like to propose that the switch simply be thrown and any
>> non-multi-arch code be ripped out. Acceptance criteria for such a
>> change being simply `it still builds'.
>>
>> This shouldn't affect things like GNU/Linux, which, I believe, do
>> already build with multi-arch enabled.
>>
>> This will, however, affect non-nulti-arch SPARC targets such as the
>> sparclet potentially leading to breakage.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
>
> How's Solaris affected? That's the only SPARC target that sees real
> use lately.
>
> Not that it seems to work very well.
Shouldn't be affected (...):
$ grep 'define GDB_MULTI_ARCH' *
tm-linux.h:#define GDB_MULTI_ARCH GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL
tm-nbsd.h:#define GDB_MULTI_ARCH GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL
tm-sp64.h:#define GDB_MULTI_ARCH GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL
tm-sun4sol2.h:#define GDB_MULTI_ARCH GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-11-25 21:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-11-25 13:17 Always multi-arch the SPARC, dump sparclet? Andrew Cagney
2002-11-25 13:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-11-25 13:28 ` Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox