From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-11263-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 24101 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2002 21:21:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 24077 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2002 21:21:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Nov 2002 21:21:35 -0000
Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail)
	by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18GSY7-0002vZ-00; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:21:56 -0600
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18GQfd-0005e7-00; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 16:21:33 -0500
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:21:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Always multi-arch the SPARC, dump sparclet?
Message-ID: <20021125212132.GA21684@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>,
	gdb@sources.redhat.com
References: <3DE2937F.4010007@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3DE2937F.4010007@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00360.txt.bz2

On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 04:17:51PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> The SPARC target has a number of variants that don't yet build with 
> multi-arch enabled (e.g., sparc-elf).
> 
> I'd like to propose that the switch simply be thrown and any 
> non-multi-arch code be ripped out.  Acceptance criteria for such a 
> change being simply `it still builds'.
> 
> This shouldn't affect things like GNU/Linux, which, I believe, do 
> already build with multi-arch enabled.
> 
> This will, however, affect non-nulti-arch SPARC targets such as the 
> sparclet potentially leading to breakage.
> 
> Thoughts?

How's Solaris affected?  That's the only SPARC target that sees real
use lately.

Not that it seems to work very well.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer