Re: gdb-5.x and step over inline functions

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>]

On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 03:14:00PM +0200, Iso-H wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Iso-H wrote:
> > 
> > >  Is there any way to step over inline functions 
> > >  when using gdb >= 5.1 ? Some (commandline or other)option 
> > >  perhaps?
> > 
> > Doesn't `until' do that?  That is, given that line 123 calls an inline 
> > function, and line 124 is the one after the inline function returns, you 
> > should be able to say "until 124" and get what you want.  Does that work?
> 
>   It isn't same; for example if I want to say: "list f_MyFunction"
>   and if there is (==beginning of "f_MyFunction") some objects 
>   which have inline constructors I get list of those constructor(s)
>   NOT list of "f_MyFunction" as I expected/wanted.  Besides, 
>   I have to check what is the line number from source code by editor 
>   because gdb can't show that line to me.
> 
>   Same goes with "next"; if I set breakpoint: "b f_MyFunction"
>   I don't get what I want, because I end up to inside of those
>   f*king inline constructor(s) again when breakpoint is reached!
> 
>   All this works with gdb-5.0, so gdb-5.1.x behaves
>   differently here...

Could you provide a small testcase, with source and a compile
commandline?  By small I also mean including no system headers.  I'll
try to see what has changed.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer