From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7012 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2002 16:40:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6925 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2002 16:40:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Feb 2002 16:40:09 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16f1h2-0002Bk-00; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 11:40:08 -0500 Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 08:40:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Iso-H Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb-5.x and step over inline functions Message-ID: <20020224114008.B8162@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Iso-H , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00286.txt.bz2 On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 03:14:00PM +0200, Iso-H wrote: > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Iso-H wrote: > > > > > Is there any way to step over inline functions > > > when using gdb >= 5.1 ? Some (commandline or other)option > > > perhaps? > > > > Doesn't `until' do that? That is, given that line 123 calls an inline > > function, and line 124 is the one after the inline function returns, you > > should be able to say "until 124" and get what you want. Does that work? > > It isn't same; for example if I want to say: "list f_MyFunction" > and if there is (==beginning of "f_MyFunction") some objects > which have inline constructors I get list of those constructor(s) > NOT list of "f_MyFunction" as I expected/wanted. Besides, > I have to check what is the line number from source code by editor > because gdb can't show that line to me. > > Same goes with "next"; if I set breakpoint: "b f_MyFunction" > I don't get what I want, because I end up to inside of those > f*king inline constructor(s) again when breakpoint is reached! > > All this works with gdb-5.0, so gdb-5.1.x behaves > differently here... Could you provide a small testcase, with source and a compile commandline? By small I also mean including no system headers. I'll try to see what has changed. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer