From: Iso-H <jd@ts.ray.fi>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gdb-5.x and step over inline functions
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 05:14:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0202241513220.16535-100000@alphatux2.ts.ray.fi> (raw)
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Iso-H wrote:
>
> > Is there any way to step over inline functions
> > when using gdb >= 5.1 ? Some (commandline or other)option
> > perhaps?
>
> Doesn't `until' do that? That is, given that line 123 calls an inline
> function, and line 124 is the one after the inline function returns, you
> should be able to say "until 124" and get what you want. Does that work?
It isn't same; for example if I want to say: "list f_MyFunction"
and if there is (==beginning of "f_MyFunction") some objects
which have inline constructors I get list of those constructor(s)
NOT list of "f_MyFunction" as I expected/wanted. Besides,
I have to check what is the line number from source code by editor
because gdb can't show that line to me.
Same goes with "next"; if I set breakpoint: "b f_MyFunction"
I don't get what I want, because I end up to inside of those
f*king inline constructor(s) again when breakpoint is reached!
All this works with gdb-5.0, so gdb-5.1.x behaves
differently here...
>
> > I have used gcc option "-g3" with compilations and
> > my host/target arch is GNULinux-alpha (ev56/ev67) but
> > I think that this "step over inline functions" problem
> > exist on other archs too.
>
> Does it help to use -gstabs+ instead of -g3? (I assume the latter is a
> synonym for -gdwarf-2 on your system.)
I tried, but it didn't help...
>
--
Iso-H
next reply other threads:[~2002-02-24 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-24 5:14 Iso-H [this message]
2002-02-24 8:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-02-24 9:25 ` Iso-H
2002-02-24 10:09 ` Iso-H
2002-02-24 10:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-19 8:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-24 12:33 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-02-24 13:29 ` Iso-H
2002-02-25 23:44 ` Iso-H
2002-02-24 11:33 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-02-24 11:45 ` Iso-H
2002-02-24 8:30 Salman Khilji
2002-02-24 2:37 Iso-H
2002-02-24 3:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0202241513220.16535-100000@alphatux2.ts.ray.fi \
--to=jd@ts.ray.fi \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox