* ARM multi-arch NEWS
@ 2002-02-19 8:46 Andrew Cagney
2002-02-19 8:49 ` Richard Earnshaw
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-02-19 8:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Earnshaw, gdb
Richard,
Can I suggest adding an entry to the NEWS file mentioning that the Arm
is now multi-arch?
enjoy,
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ARM multi-arch NEWS
2002-02-19 8:46 ARM multi-arch NEWS Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-02-19 8:49 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-02-19 9:01 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Earnshaw @ 2002-02-19 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: Richard Earnshaw, gdb
> Richard,
>
> Can I suggest adding an entry to the NEWS file mentioning that the Arm
> is now multi-arch?
>
> enjoy,
> Andrew
>
Well, so far only one target is genuinely multi-arch. The rest (including
generic) are still not quite there ;-(
R.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ARM multi-arch NEWS
2002-02-19 8:49 ` Richard Earnshaw
@ 2002-02-19 9:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-19 9:33 ` Richard Earnshaw
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-02-19 9:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard.Earnshaw; +Cc: gdb
> Richard,
>>
>> Can I suggest adding an entry to the NEWS file mentioning that the Arm
>> is now multi-arch?
>>
>> enjoy,
>> Andrew
>>
>
>
> Well, so far only one target is genuinely multi-arch. The rest (including
> generic) are still not quite there ;-(
I think just getting to the point of throwing the multi-arch switch
(level 1) is newsworthy achievement :-) (It also serves as a heads up
to Arm developers - many of the big V little bugs just mysteriously
disappeared :-)).
enjoy,
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ARM multi-arch NEWS
2002-02-19 9:01 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-02-19 9:33 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-02-19 13:09 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Earnshaw @ 2002-02-19 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: Richard.Earnshaw, gdb
> > Richard,
> >>
> >> Can I suggest adding an entry to the NEWS file mentioning that the Arm
> >> is now multi-arch?
> >>
> >> enjoy,
> >> Andrew
> >>
> >
> >
> > Well, so far only one target is genuinely multi-arch. The rest (including
> > generic) are still not quite there ;-(
>
> I think just getting to the point of throwing the multi-arch switch
> (level 1) is newsworthy achievement :-) (It also serves as a heads up
> to Arm developers - many of the big V little bugs just mysteriously
> disappeared :-)).
>
> enjoy,
> Andrew
>
Hmm, something like this then?
diff -p -r1.56 NEWS
*** NEWS 2002/02/10 17:34:05 1.56
--- NEWS 2002/02/19 17:14:50
*************** it will be treated as a corefile. If it
*** 36,43 ****
--- 36,49 ----
GDB will attempt to attach it as a process, and if no such process
is found, will then attempt to open it as a corefile.
+ * Changes in ARM configurations.
+
+ Multi-arch support is enabled for all ARM configurations. The ARM/NetBSD
+ configuration is fully multi-arch.
+
* New native configurations
+ ARM NetBSD arm*-*-netbsd*
x86 OpenBSD i[3456]86-*-openbsd*
AMD x86-64 running GNU/Linux x86_64-*-linux-*
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ARM multi-arch NEWS
2002-02-19 9:33 ` Richard Earnshaw
@ 2002-02-19 13:09 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-20 2:50 ` Richard Earnshaw
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-02-19 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard.Earnshaw; +Cc: gdb
> I think just getting to the point of throwing the multi-arch switch
>> (level 1) is newsworthy achievement :-) (It also serves as a heads up
>> to Arm developers - many of the big V little bugs just mysteriously
>> disappeared :-)).
>>
>> enjoy,
>> Andrew
>>
>
>
> Hmm, something like this then?
>
> diff -p -r1.56 NEWS
> *** NEWS 2002/02/10 17:34:05 1.56
> --- NEWS 2002/02/19 17:14:50
> *************** it will be treated as a corefile. If it
> *** 36,43 ****
> --- 36,49 ----
> GDB will attempt to attach it as a process, and if no such process
> is found, will then attempt to open it as a corefile.
>
> + * Changes in ARM configurations.
> +
> + Multi-arch support is enabled for all ARM configurations. The ARM/NetBSD
> + configuration is fully multi-arch.
> +
> * New native configurations
Yep!
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ARM multi-arch NEWS
2002-02-19 13:09 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-02-20 2:50 ` Richard Earnshaw
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Earnshaw @ 2002-02-20 2:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: Richard.Earnshaw, gdb
> > Hmm, something like this then?
> >
> > diff -p -r1.56 NEWS
> > *** NEWS 2002/02/10 17:34:05 1.56
> > --- NEWS 2002/02/19 17:14:50
> > *************** it will be treated as a corefile. If it
> > *** 36,43 ****
> > --- 36,49 ----
> > GDB will attempt to attach it as a process, and if no such process
> > is found, will then attempt to open it as a corefile.
> >
> > + * Changes in ARM configurations.
> > +
> > + Multi-arch support is enabled for all ARM configurations. The ARM/NetBSD
> > + configuration is fully multi-arch.
> > +
> > * New native configurations
>
> Yep!
Committed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-02-20 10:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-02-19 8:46 ARM multi-arch NEWS Andrew Cagney
2002-02-19 8:49 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-02-19 9:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-19 9:33 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-02-19 13:09 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-20 2:50 ` Richard Earnshaw
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox