From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6069 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2002 17:01:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5895 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2002 17:01:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Feb 2002 17:01:19 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F4F3D11; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 12:01:18 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C7284DD.7080900@cygnus.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 09:01:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: ARM multi-arch NEWS References: <200202191648.QAA24407@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2 > Richard, >> >> Can I suggest adding an entry to the NEWS file mentioning that the Arm >> is now multi-arch? >> >> enjoy, >> Andrew >> > > > Well, so far only one target is genuinely multi-arch. The rest (including > generic) are still not quite there ;-( I think just getting to the point of throwing the multi-arch switch (level 1) is newsworthy achievement :-) (It also serves as a heads up to Arm developers - many of the big V little bugs just mysteriously disappeared :-)). enjoy, Andrew