Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: Obsolete m32r?
@ 2002-01-16 16:25 Doug Evans
  2002-01-16 16:37 ` Michael Snyder
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Doug Evans @ 2002-01-16 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ac131313; +Cc: msnyder, gdb

Andrew Cagney wrote something like:
>Michael,
>
>The m32r needs to be multi-arch.  I'm not sure what you want to do with 
>it though.
>
>You could, for instance, just let it be made obsolete.  Any thoughts?
>
>Andrew

And break my heart?!  Oh cruel world ...


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Obsolete m32r?
  2002-01-16 16:25 Obsolete m32r? Doug Evans
@ 2002-01-16 16:37 ` Michael Snyder
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael Snyder @ 2002-01-16 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Doug Evans; +Cc: ac131313, msnyder, gdb

Doug Evans wrote:
> 
> Andrew Cagney wrote something like:
> >Michael,
> >
> >The m32r needs to be multi-arch.  I'm not sure what you want to do with
> >it though.
> >
> >You could, for instance, just let it be made obsolete.  Any thoughts?
> >
> >Andrew
> 
> And break my heart?!  Oh cruel world ...

Hey Doug!  Aren't you eager to try your hand at 
multi-arching a GDB back-end?    ;-)

xxoo, 
Michael


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Obsolete m32r?
  2002-01-09  9:24   ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-01-10 14:28     ` LeakyStain
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: LeakyStain @ 2002-01-10 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: gdb

It would help if the gdbint.info was updated first, to label the macros
obsolete or deprecated, and describe multi-arch more completely.

I started working on a port of gdb 5.0 to the ut69r in September 2001, 
and I read gdbint.info pretty thoroughly; there was only one mention of
multi-arch, and it was pretty obscure. So I implemented the macros, and 
now I discover I have to change them.

-- Stephe

Andrew Cagney wrote:

> In GDB 5.2 we're ment to have everything multi-arched so this target
> needs to be done.   I don't actually think that goal will be achived but
> we should at least be working on it.
> 
> Andrew


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Obsolete m32r?
  2002-01-06 21:23 ` Michael Snyder
@ 2002-01-09  9:24   ` Andrew Cagney
  2002-01-10 14:28     ` LeakyStain
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-01-09  9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Snyder; +Cc: msnyder, gdb

> Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Michael,
>> 
>> The m32r needs to be multi-arch.  I'm not sure what you want to do with
>> it though.
>> 
>> You could, for instance, just let it be made obsolete.  Any thoughts?
> 
> 
> Mitsubishi still uses it (both the chip and the tools), 
> so I don't think obsoleting it would be appropriate.
> 
> What brings this up?


In GDB 5.2 we're ment to have everything multi-arched so this target 
needs to be done.   I don't actually think that goal will be achived but 
we should at least be working on it.

Andrew


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Obsolete m32r?
  2002-01-06  9:44 Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-01-06 21:23 ` Michael Snyder
  2002-01-09  9:24   ` Andrew Cagney
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael Snyder @ 2002-01-06 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: msnyder, gdb

Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> Michael,
> 
> The m32r needs to be multi-arch.  I'm not sure what you want to do with
> it though.
> 
> You could, for instance, just let it be made obsolete.  Any thoughts?

Mitsubishi still uses it (both the chip and the tools), 
so I don't think obsoleting it would be appropriate.

What brings this up?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Obsolete m32r?
@ 2002-01-06  9:44 Andrew Cagney
  2002-01-06 21:23 ` Michael Snyder
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-01-06  9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: msnyder; +Cc: gdb

Michael,

The m32r needs to be multi-arch.  I'm not sure what you want to do with 
it though.

You could, for instance, just let it be made obsolete.  Any thoughts?

Andrew


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-01-17  0:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-01-16 16:25 Obsolete m32r? Doug Evans
2002-01-16 16:37 ` Michael Snyder
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-06  9:44 Andrew Cagney
2002-01-06 21:23 ` Michael Snyder
2002-01-09  9:24   ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-10 14:28     ` LeakyStain

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox