From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18001 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2002 17:24:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17974 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2002 17:24:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (24.114.42.213) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Jan 2002 17:24:34 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734E53CC7; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 12:24:24 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C3C7CC8.4070409@cygnus.com> Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 09:24:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020103 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Snyder Cc: msnyder@cygnus.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Obsolete m32r? References: <3C388CE9.3080102@cygnus.com> <3C392FE0.5395@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00061.txt.bz2 > Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> >> Michael, >> >> The m32r needs to be multi-arch. I'm not sure what you want to do with >> it though. >> >> You could, for instance, just let it be made obsolete. Any thoughts? > > > Mitsubishi still uses it (both the chip and the tools), > so I don't think obsoleting it would be appropriate. > > What brings this up? In GDB 5.2 we're ment to have everything multi-arched so this target needs to be done. I don't actually think that goal will be achived but we should at least be working on it. Andrew