* src/intl
@ 2001-11-26 17:10 Ben Elliston
2001-11-15 11:26 ` src/intl Ben Elliston
2001-11-26 20:42 ` src/intl Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ben Elliston @ 2001-11-26 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils, gdb
I have updated the version of libintl in my local src/ tree -- now
based on gettext 0.10.35. Does anyone have any objections to this
update? I've looked through the diffs and the changes appear
harmless.
Ben
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* src/intl
2001-11-26 17:10 src/intl Ben Elliston
@ 2001-11-15 11:26 ` Ben Elliston
2001-11-26 20:42 ` src/intl Andrew Cagney
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ben Elliston @ 2001-11-15 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils, gdb
I have updated the version of libintl in my local src/ tree -- now
based on gettext 0.10.35. Does anyone have any objections to this
update? I've looked through the diffs and the changes appear
harmless.
Ben
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: src/intl
2001-11-26 17:10 src/intl Ben Elliston
2001-11-15 11:26 ` src/intl Ben Elliston
@ 2001-11-26 20:42 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-16 5:41 ` src/intl Andrew Cagney
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2001-11-26 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Elliston; +Cc: binutils, gdb
> I have updated the version of libintl in my local src/ tree -- now
> based on gettext 0.10.35. Does anyone have any objections to this
> update? I've looked through the diffs and the changes appear
> harmless.
Just FYI, GDB currently only has an indirect interest in this. BFD
probably has a more direct interest (NickC?).
so ok by me :-)
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: src/intl
2001-11-26 20:42 ` src/intl Andrew Cagney
@ 2001-11-16 5:41 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2001-11-16 5:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Elliston; +Cc: binutils, gdb
> I have updated the version of libintl in my local src/ tree -- now
> based on gettext 0.10.35. Does anyone have any objections to this
> update? I've looked through the diffs and the changes appear
> harmless.
Just FYI, GDB currently only has an indirect interest in this. BFD
probably has a more direct interest (NickC?).
so ok by me :-)
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-11-27 4:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-11-26 17:10 src/intl Ben Elliston
2001-11-15 11:26 ` src/intl Ben Elliston
2001-11-26 20:42 ` src/intl Andrew Cagney
2001-11-16 5:41 ` src/intl Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox