From: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: MI non-stop mode spec
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 06:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18400.32557.752481.709565@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200803190016.02072.vladimir@codesourcery.com>
> (*) Current MI syntax says that any result record must be followed by a
> prompt. For sync targets, this is wrong -- when gdb prints ^running
> and resumes the target, it does not check for input, so (gdb) is misleading.
> When the target stops, the *stopped message, followed by the prompt is
> printed -- and it's at this point that gdb starts to accept the input
> again. So, I propose to remove the prompt right after ^running for the
> sync targets.
It's not a prompt, just a delimiter. For a start it has a newline after it.
Furthermore if you change the prompt with "set prompt", it doesn't change.
> Each MI command results in either ^done, ^error, ^connected or ^running
> response. The ^connected response is basically identical to ^done,
> and the naming is different for historic reasons. All of those
> except for ^running are immediately followed by prompt. The ^running
> response means that the target has started running. Further events
> from the target will be reported using async notifications.
>
> The async notifications are for various interesting events that cannot
> generally be reported as result of a command. For example,
>
> =thread-created
This notification doesn't appear to be in the manual. Why are there no
equivalent =thread-exited notifications?
>...
> Presently, MI spec says a command can output ^running just once.
> However, it the presense of breakpoint commands, it's quite possible
> that we resume one thread, hit a breakpoint, and breakpoint commands
> resume all threads, or some other thread.
>
> To handle this case we need a new async output for this case:
>
> *running,thread-id="xxx"
^running,thread-id="xxx" ? ("running" isn't an out-of-bound record)
> which is emitted whenever a previously stopped thread is resumed.
> In case all threads are resumed, "xxx" will be "all".
> To simplify things, if GDB is started in MI mode, no CLI command is allowed
> while the target is running, and -interpreter-exec is not allowed either.
If you can make this work with MI commands, it should be easy to add CLI
commands to do the same thing. I will do this.
>...
> - Thread commands. The -thread-info command should be implemented (a
> patch is already posted).
Notice that there is currently an inconsistency here:
-exec-run
^running
(gdb)
*stopped,reason="breakpoint-hit",bkptno="1",thread-id="0",...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
while
(gdb)
-thread-info
^done,threads=[]
(gdb)
-thread-info 0
^done,threads=[]
(gdb)
b main thread 0
&"b main thread 0\n"
&"Unknown thread 0.\n"
^error,msg="Unknown thread 0."
(gdb)
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-19 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-19 2:49 Vladimir Prus
2008-03-19 6:26 ` Nick Roberts [this message]
2008-03-19 9:14 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-19 10:02 ` Nick Roberts
2008-03-19 11:10 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-19 12:30 ` Nick Roberts
2008-03-19 13:43 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-19 20:44 ` Michael Snyder
2008-03-19 11:20 ` Bob Rossi
2008-03-19 11:16 ` Bob Rossi
2008-03-19 12:01 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-19 13:50 ` Bob Rossi
2008-03-19 14:07 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-19 14:33 ` Bob Rossi
2008-03-19 16:09 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-20 18:22 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-03-20 20:02 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-21 9:11 ` Nick Roberts
2008-03-21 9:48 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-21 18:13 ` Nick Roberts
2008-03-22 0:33 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-23 4:41 ` Nick Roberts
2008-03-23 5:18 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-23 9:25 ` Nick Roberts
2008-03-24 5:44 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-24 7:05 ` Thread bound variable objects [was: Re: MI non-stop mode spec] Nick Roberts
2008-03-24 7:18 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-24 11:04 ` Nick Roberts
2008-03-24 14:38 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-25 6:28 ` Thread bound variable objects Nick Roberts
2008-03-25 11:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-03-21 11:52 ` MI non-stop mode spec Vladimir Prus
2008-03-24 23:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-03-25 17:46 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-22 17:33 ` Pawel Piech
2008-03-24 4:03 ` Nick Roberts
2008-03-24 17:22 ` Pawel Piech
2008-03-24 20:23 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-25 2:14 ` Nick Roberts
2008-03-24 18:38 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-24 21:25 ` Pawel Piech
2008-03-24 21:46 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-24 22:28 ` Pawel Piech
2008-03-25 12:30 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-25 18:30 ` Pawel Piech
2008-03-27 14:13 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-27 19:39 ` Pawel Piech
2008-03-25 21:28 ` Nick Roberts
2008-03-26 13:03 ` Pawel Piech
2008-03-25 1:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-03-25 18:18 ` Pawel Piech
2008-03-30 21:36 ` Pawel Piech
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18400.32557.752481.709565@kahikatea.snap.net.nz \
--to=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=vladimir@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox