From: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>,
eliz@gnu.org, dewar@adacore.com, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com,
Mathieu.Lacage@sophia.inria.fr, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Signed/unsigned character arrays are not strings
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:54:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17894.9280.176924.436257@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070228134640.GA11261@caradoc.them.org>
> While I haven't seen responses to some of my arguments in favor of the
> new behavior, it's obvious that I'm in the minority here.
Yes, but I think choices should be based on reason, not gut feeling. The
change didn't receive much attention for a month, so it can't be that great a
problem.
>...
> By the way, I was thinking about this last night and wondered if
> this is hinting at a sensible meaning for "print /s" ...
I like this approach because it's simple. Jim's is too complicated (well,
for me, at least!).
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-01 0:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-24 16:13 Nick Roberts
2007-02-24 20:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-02-24 20:53 ` Nick Roberts
2007-02-24 21:07 ` Jan Kratochvil
2007-02-25 8:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-02-25 19:54 ` Nick Roberts
2007-02-25 21:07 ` mathieu lacage
2007-02-26 0:45 ` Jan Kratochvil
2007-02-27 7:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-27 9:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-02-27 12:02 ` Nick Roberts
2007-02-27 17:06 ` Robert Dewar
2007-02-27 18:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-02-27 21:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-27 22:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-02-27 22:14 ` Mark Kettenis
2007-02-28 0:47 ` Paul Koning
2007-02-28 1:14 ` Jim Blandy
2007-02-28 1:59 ` Jim Blandy
2007-02-28 5:26 ` Nick Roberts
2007-02-28 14:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-03-01 0:43 ` Jim Blandy
2007-03-01 0:54 ` Nick Roberts [this message]
2007-02-27 21:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-27 22:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-04-10 21:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-02-28 13:05 pkoning
2007-03-01 11:01 ` Mark Kettenis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17894.9280.176924.436257@kahikatea.snap.net.nz \
--to=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
--cc=Mathieu.Lacage@sophia.inria.fr \
--cc=dewar@adacore.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox