Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: Record patch in main GDB tree?
       [not found] <d592e5da0804071129j2819b2fej3e65361088a19be6@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2008-04-07 19:06 ` jonatan perry
  2008-04-07 19:30   ` Michael Snyder
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: jonatan perry @ 2008-04-07 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb

Hi list :)
I was wonder - why does the *record patch isn't merged to the main GDB
development tree?

*http://sourceforge.net/projects/record/

Thanks,
Jonatan Perry.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Record patch in main GDB tree?
  2008-04-07 19:06 ` Record patch in main GDB tree? jonatan perry
@ 2008-04-07 19:30   ` Michael Snyder
  2008-04-08 10:58     ` Christopher Faylor
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Snyder @ 2008-04-07 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jonatan perry; +Cc: gdb

On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 20:32 +0200, jonatan perry wrote:
> Hi list :)
> I was wonder - why does the *record patch isn't merged to the main GDB
> development tree?
> 
> *http://sourceforge.net/projects/record/
> 
> Thanks,
> Jonatan Perry.

First I recall hearing of it.

Has anybody offered to submit it to gdb?



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Record patch in main GDB tree?
  2008-04-07 19:30   ` Michael Snyder
@ 2008-04-08 10:58     ` Christopher Faylor
  2008-04-08 18:58       ` jonatan perry
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2008-04-08 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Snyder, jonatan perry, gdb

On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:13:31PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
>On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 20:32 +0200, jonatan perry wrote:
>> Hi list :)
>> I was wonder - why does the *record patch isn't merged to the main GDB
>> development tree?
>> 
>> *http://sourceforge.net/projects/record/
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Jonatan Perry.
>
>First I recall hearing of it.
>
>Has anybody offered to submit it to gdb?

Does it actually work?

cgf


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Record patch in main GDB tree?
  2008-04-08 10:58     ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2008-04-08 18:58       ` jonatan perry
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jonatan perry @ 2008-04-08 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Snyder, jonatan perry, gdb

I'lll do the required testes to see if its actually works and report ASAP...

Jonatan Perry.

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Christopher Faylor
<cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:13:31PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
>  >On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 20:32 +0200, jonatan perry wrote:
>  >> Hi list :)
>  >> I was wonder - why does the *record patch isn't merged to the main GDB
>  >> development tree?
>  >>
>  >> *http://sourceforge.net/projects/record/
>  >>
>  >> Thanks,
>  >> Jonatan Perry.
>  >
>  >First I recall hearing of it.
>  >
>  >Has anybody offered to submit it to gdb?
>
>  Does it actually work?
>
>  cgf
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-04-07 19:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <d592e5da0804071129j2819b2fej3e65361088a19be6@mail.gmail.com>
2008-04-07 19:06 ` Record patch in main GDB tree? jonatan perry
2008-04-07 19:30   ` Michael Snyder
2008-04-08 10:58     ` Christopher Faylor
2008-04-08 18:58       ` jonatan perry

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox