From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26638 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2008 18:32:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 26625 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Apr 2008 18:32:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.189) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:32:18 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a1so600262tib.12 for ; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:32:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.121.2 with SMTP id t2mr2880598ybc.69.1207593134063; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.83.1 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 11:32:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:06:00 -0000 From: "jonatan perry" To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Record patch in main GDB tree? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2 Hi list :) I was wonder - why does the *record patch isn't merged to the main GDB development tree? *http://sourceforge.net/projects/record/ Thanks, Jonatan Perry.