From: "Alpár Jüttner" <alpar@cs.elte.hu>
To: Dave Korn <dave.korn@artimi.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: RE: New MI maintainer
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:58:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1203724876.4440.70.camel@piko.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <007a01c875ab$aae85770$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
I think, the real issue is not the openness of the project management,
but this:
> Given that I have made significant contributions
> to GDB/MI over a long period of time then it would then seem appropriate to at
> least e-mail me off-list before the announcement to inform me of your
> intention.
As far as I see, nobody has commented on this sentence of Nick. I think
it would be worth doing that, at least before blaming him and saying
that a global maintainer must have a higher level of ability of being
able to avoid heated personal debates.
As a complete outsider, my feeling is that if Nick had really been
considered as a valuable and important member of the community rather
than someone who should be "outmaneuvered", then exactly the same
decision would have been communicated toward him in a much more friendly
way.
Although Nick's responses in this thread are offensive and his
statements may even be false, I understand his bad feeling and I must
say it - at least partially - justifies his reactions.
Some people expected an apology in this thread but nobody seemed to be
thinking about whether he should apologize. More than one person made a
mistake in this awkward story. I strongly believe that a frank 'sorry'
from the one who made the first one would be followed by others.
After all, this is a great community of great people. With no exception.
All the best,
Alpar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-23 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-19 19:37 Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-02-19 20:29 ` Nick Roberts
2008-02-19 20:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-02-19 20:47 ` Nick Roberts
2008-02-21 1:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-02-20 3:12 ` Bob Rossi
2008-02-20 8:59 ` Richard Stallman
2008-02-21 21:37 ` Bob Rossi
2008-02-20 19:05 ` Richard Stallman
2008-02-20 20:00 ` Nick Roberts
2008-02-20 20:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-02-20 21:20 ` Nick Roberts
2008-02-20 21:50 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-02-20 23:25 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-02-22 3:34 ` Nick Roberts
2008-02-22 17:37 ` Thomas Dineen
2008-02-22 22:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-02-22 22:14 ` Christopher Faylor
2008-02-22 22:23 ` Bob Rossi
2008-02-23 0:01 ` Dave Korn
2008-02-23 0:58 ` Alpár Jüttner [this message]
2008-02-23 8:16 ` Jim Blandy
2008-02-23 11:13 ` Nick Roberts
2008-02-23 11:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-02-23 12:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-02-22 23:36 ` Jim Blandy
2008-02-21 19:25 ` Stan Shebs
2008-02-22 4:08 ` Nick Roberts
2008-02-22 2:52 ` Bob Rossi
2008-02-22 8:43 ` Vladimir Prus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1203724876.4440.70.camel@piko.site \
--to=alpar@cs.elte.hu \
--cc=dave.korn@artimi.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox