From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Bob Rossi <bob_rossi@cox.net>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: New MI maintainer
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:34:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ulk5bj553.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080222222124.GH26716@brasko.net> (message from Bob Rossi on Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:21:24 -0500)
> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:21:24 -0500
> From: Bob Rossi <bob_rossi@cox.net>
>
> > It's interesting how often people try to tack on bigger concerns to the
> > simple concept of Free Software. Free Software isn't supposed to be
> > solving global warming and it isn't supposed to be a demonstration of a
> > New World Order with feel-good cum ba yah. It's just a guarantee that
> > you get the source code for the software that you're using.
> >
> > Managing any project where people are involved means that sometimes the
> > people in charge have to have frank, private conversations. The
> > alternative, as Stan Shebs, notes is to essentially do performance
> > reviews in the open.
> >
> > Some projects *do* work that way but they are hardly bastions of
> > civilized discourse.
>
> This rhetoric annoys me. I was bringing up a sincere concern that I
> have. I suggested a more open model because I've been wondering for
> well over 5 years why it (used to?) takes 6 months to get a code review.
The long review time has nothing to do with the issue at hand, or with
the above rhetoric.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-23 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-19 19:37 Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-02-19 20:29 ` Nick Roberts
2008-02-19 20:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-02-19 20:47 ` Nick Roberts
2008-02-21 1:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-02-20 3:12 ` Bob Rossi
2008-02-20 8:59 ` Richard Stallman
2008-02-21 21:37 ` Bob Rossi
2008-02-20 19:05 ` Richard Stallman
2008-02-20 20:00 ` Nick Roberts
2008-02-20 20:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-02-20 21:20 ` Nick Roberts
2008-02-20 21:50 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-02-20 23:25 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-02-22 3:34 ` Nick Roberts
2008-02-22 17:37 ` Thomas Dineen
2008-02-22 22:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-02-22 22:14 ` Christopher Faylor
2008-02-22 22:23 ` Bob Rossi
2008-02-23 0:01 ` Dave Korn
2008-02-23 0:58 ` Alpár Jüttner
2008-02-23 8:16 ` Jim Blandy
2008-02-23 11:13 ` Nick Roberts
2008-02-23 11:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-02-23 12:34 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2008-02-22 23:36 ` Jim Blandy
2008-02-21 19:25 ` Stan Shebs
2008-02-22 4:08 ` Nick Roberts
2008-02-22 2:52 ` Bob Rossi
2008-02-22 8:43 ` Vladimir Prus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ulk5bj553.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=bob_rossi@cox.net \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox