* cache skip_prologue()?
@ 2002-04-17 9:55 Andrew Cagney
2002-04-17 10:55 ` Kevin Buettner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-04-17 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Buettner, gdb
Kevin,
Stumbled across this. Have you considered changing the rs6000 code so
that the result of skip_prolgue() is cached in a new (allocate on
demand) field: frame->extra_info->fddata?
It wouldn't catch all cases but it would catch the ones where there is a
frame.
enjoy,
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: cache skip_prologue()?
2002-04-17 9:55 cache skip_prologue()? Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-04-17 10:55 ` Kevin Buettner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Buettner @ 2002-04-17 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney, Kevin Buettner, gdb
On Apr 17, 12:55pm, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Stumbled across this. Have you considered changing the rs6000 code so
> that the result of skip_prolgue() is cached in a new (allocate on
> demand) field: frame->extra_info->fddata?
>
> It wouldn't catch all cases but it would catch the ones where there is a
> frame.
Hmm... that does seem like a good idea. skip_prologue() is called from
quite a few places, isn't it.
Thanks,
Kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-04-17 17:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-04-17 9:55 cache skip_prologue()? Andrew Cagney
2002-04-17 10:55 ` Kevin Buettner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox