From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25152 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2002 17:55:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25079 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2002 17:55:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Apr 2002 17:55:56 -0000 Received: from romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (romulus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.251]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA25772; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 10:55:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kev@localhost) by romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g3HHtlm03160; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 10:55:47 -0700 Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 10:55:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1020417175546.ZM3159@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney "cache skip_prologue()?" (Apr 17, 12:55pm) References: <3CBDA913.1000906@cygnus.com> To: Andrew Cagney , Kevin Buettner , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: cache skip_prologue()? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00289.txt.bz2 On Apr 17, 12:55pm, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Stumbled across this. Have you considered changing the rs6000 code so > that the result of skip_prolgue() is cached in a new (allocate on > demand) field: frame->extra_info->fddata? > > It wouldn't catch all cases but it would catch the ones where there is a > frame. Hmm... that does seem like a good idea. skip_prologue() is called from quite a few places, isn't it. Thanks, Kevin