Re: GDB 6.1 "frozen"

[David Carlton <carlton@kealia.com>]

On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:53:06 +0200, "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org> said:

>> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:14:37 -0500
>> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
>> > 
>> > 2004-03-25  David Carlton  <carlton@kealia.com>
>> > 
>> > 	* PROBLEMS: Refer to gdb/1588 instead of gdb/826.
>> 
>> Ok it's "frozen" except for doco changes such as this (and the above, 
>> and another entry I need to fix for frames that I forgot ...).  Anyway, Eli?

> I have no objections to David's suggestion, except that the manual
> seems to already say that C++ symbols might need quoting in some
> situations, right?

I didn't see that when I just skimmed the manual, but I might have
missed it.  (I did see some other out-of-date things.  Hmm.)

> However, if the people who work on C++ support feel that this
> particular problem needs to be in PROBLEMS, I don't object.

I have mixed feelings about Michael's desire of mentioning everything
that could be called a regression, no matter how small, in PROBLEMS.
However, that's a separate argument; given that this issue is
currently referred to in PROBLEMS, we might as well at least have the
reference be accurate, while we continue our argument about the scope
of problems.

I'll apply the patch to mainline and 6.1.

David Carlton
carlton@kealia.com