Re: RFC: Add 'double' member to 64-bit vector register type

[Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>]

Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl> writes:
>    From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
>    Date: 05 Apr 2005 11:55:43 -0500
> 
>    Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl> writes:
>    >    Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:33:07 -0500
>    >    From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>    > 
>    >    On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 04:13:12PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote:
>    >    > Well, that brings up the other thought --- since the set of types
>    >    > useful to include in a vector register really depends on the
>    >    > architecture, wouldn't it be better to just export the convenience
>    >    > functions for constructing these types from gdbtypes.c and then let
>    >    > architectures build ones that actually suit their needs?
>    > 
>    >    My inclination is "yes".  Anybody else?
>    > 
>    > I agree.
> 
>    Getting back to this...
> 
>    Here's a patch to move the IA-32 vector types out of gdbtypes.h.  The
>    PowerPC Altivec and SPE types are a little more work, since they
>    need to be per-architecture, so I'll leave that to a separate patch.
> 
>    How does this look?
> 
> Looks fine to me, except for one nit: can you remove the "excessive"
> spacing (one blank line between functions is more than enough,
> especially since all the new stuff logically belongs together).

Done, and committed.  Thanks!