From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
To: Paul Hilfinger <hilfingr@gnat.com>
Cc: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Introduce notion of "search name"
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 14:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vt28yh92mzf.fsf@zenia.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040403120403.0A9C4F2ADF@nile.gnat.com>
Paul Hilfinger <hilfingr@gnat.com> writes:
> Do you really object to our simply making permanent copies of these
> names as needed? (I'm perfectly happy to ditch the kludgy
> objfile-finding hack.) You can't expect to save any space by
> reclaiming these demangled names space when you reload the symbol
> file, because (as I argued before) the set of demangled names
> generally doesn't change much in such cases, and we are "interning"
> the demangled symbols, so that multiple computations of the same
> demangled symbol don't increase space. This particular choice of name
> storage is confined to the Ada module (the symbol table module doesn't
> apply free to names stored in symbols, partial symbols, or minimal
> symbols, so it doesn't care if one them has a longer than necessary
> lifetime).
I tend to think it's not ideal, but okay. Daniel, you were unhappy
with this; did you have suggestions?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-06 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-03 19:15 Paul Hilfinger
2004-03-19 0:09 ` David Carlton
2004-03-03 19:26 ` David Carlton
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-03-04 8:45 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-05 3:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-05 10:39 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-03-31 22:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-01 14:53 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-01 15:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-01 15:21 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-02 9:30 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-04-02 22:27 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-03 12:04 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-04-06 14:37 ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2004-04-02 9:33 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-04-02 8:29 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-04-09 22:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-12 8:22 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-04-16 4:11 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-29 10:37 ` Paul Hilfinger
[not found] ` <20040429211458.GB27523@nevyn.them.org>
[not found] ` <vt2n04umj8b.fsf@zenia.home>
[not found] ` <20040430084538.ECDE1F2E1C@nile.gnat.com>
[not found] ` <20040430134955.GA15786@nevyn.them.org>
2004-05-03 8:49 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-05-11 19:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-12 11:00 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-05-12 13:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-12 14:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-12 14:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-12 15:11 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-12 16:59 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-05-13 14:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-13 9:30 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-05-13 13:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-18 21:59 ` Jim Blandy
2004-05-19 9:55 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-05-19 13:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-19 15:21 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-20 10:18 ` Abstracting "name" Paul Hilfinger
2004-05-21 19:10 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-21 20:01 ` Jim Blandy
2004-03-30 9:37 [RFA] Introduce notion of "search name" Paul Hilfinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vt28yh92mzf.fsf@zenia.home \
--to=jimb@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=hilfingr@gnat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox