From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: MI testsuite to use PTY for inferior
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 20:46:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uu0i82hlr.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050802035020.GA18143@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Mon, 1 Aug 2005 23:50:20 -0400)
> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 23:50:20 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
>
> Yes, but the problem's that the buffering is in the program being
> debugged. It's not the buffering of the GDB MI stream that's the
> problem, but the fact that the stdout of the program you're debugging
> would suddenly become block buffered instead of line buffered, if you
> fed it to a pipe when it expects a TTY.
This started as a discussion how to separate MI output from the
debuggee's. For that, I suggested to redirect MI's output (_not_ the
debuggee's) to a different file handle. That should not change the
buffering of the debuggee's stdout in any way. While the problem you
mention is real, it has nothing to do with separation of these two
streams: if sending the program's output to a pipe changes its
buffering, we already have that annoyance on Windows.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-02 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-30 5:54 Nick Roberts
2005-07-30 17:39 ` Bob Rossi
2005-07-30 18:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-30 22:47 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-31 1:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-30 22:47 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-30 23:03 ` Bob Rossi
2005-07-31 1:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-31 13:16 ` Bob Rossi
2005-07-31 15:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-31 21:20 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01 1:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-01 2:05 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01 2:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-01 11:32 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01 3:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-01 11:30 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01 13:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-01 13:16 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01 13:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-01 13:31 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01 14:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-01 14:07 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01 18:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-01 19:01 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-08-01 19:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-01 19:34 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-08-01 19:43 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01 20:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-01 20:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-01 20:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-02 3:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-02 3:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-02 20:46 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2005-08-02 20:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-13 17:26 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-13 21:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-31 21:35 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-31 21:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-31 23:32 ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-01 1:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-03 2:07 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-03 12:48 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-03 13:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-03 18:22 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-03 18:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-03 18:24 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-03 18:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-03 19:31 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-04 2:23 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-04 2:27 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-04 4:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-04 13:07 ` Bob Rossi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-27 3:18 Bob Rossi
2005-08-13 22:04 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-08-20 9:07 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-30 2:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-01 0:52 ` Bob Rossi
2005-09-01 22:12 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-09-01 23:52 ` Bob Rossi
2005-09-05 19:52 ` Bob Rossi
2005-09-10 4:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=uu0i82hlr.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox