Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: MI testsuite to use PTY for inferior
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 18:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <u7jf54htt.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050801113002.GB24853@white> (message from Bob Rossi on Mon, 1 Aug 2005 07:30:02 -0400)

> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 07:30:02 -0400
> From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> I am claiming that a reliable FE can not be written if the inferior writes 
> data to the same output stream as GDB/MI's output stream. So, on native 
> windows, if the inferior I/O and GDB/MI I/O can not be separated, it 
> wouldn't be worth while to write an FE on that platform.

IMHO, you are again jumping to conclusions.  The problem was that
Windows doesn't support PTYs, not that it's impossible to separate the
two output streams there.

> Nick, does Emacs port natively to windows?

Of course, it does.  I'm writing this mail in such a port ;-)

> Are there any other routes to go down here?

(Shrug) What about redirecting one of the streams to another file
handle?  I think any modern platform will support this.  We could, for
example, make this an option (it could be on by default if PTYs aren't
supported).

In fact, doesn't GDB already use a different standard output stream?
I thought it did.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-08-01 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-30  5:54 Nick Roberts
2005-07-30 17:39 ` Bob Rossi
2005-07-30 18:08   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-30 22:47     ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-31  1:19       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-30 22:47   ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-30 23:03     ` Bob Rossi
2005-07-31  1:21       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-31 13:16         ` Bob Rossi
2005-07-31 15:31           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-31 21:20             ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01  1:53               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-01  2:05                 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01  2:15                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-01 11:32                     ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01  3:56               ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-01 11:30                 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01 13:00                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-01 13:16                     ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01 13:23                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-01 13:31                         ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01 14:00                           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-01 14:07                             ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01 18:45                   ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2005-08-01 19:01                     ` Mark Kettenis
2005-08-01 19:25                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-01 19:34                         ` Mark Kettenis
2005-08-01 19:43                           ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01 20:48                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-01 20:45                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-01 20:52                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-02  3:45                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-02  3:50                             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-02 20:46                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-02 20:48                                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-13 17:26                                   ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-13 21:41                                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-31 21:35           ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-31 21:37             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-31 23:32               ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-01  1:51                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-03  2:07         ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-03 12:48           ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-03 13:19           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-03 18:22             ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-03 18:23               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-03 18:24               ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-03 18:32                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-03 19:31                   ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-04  2:23                     ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-04  2:27                       ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-04  4:05                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-04 13:07                           ` Bob Rossi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-27  3:18 Bob Rossi
2005-08-13 22:04 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-08-20  9:07   ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-30  2:55     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-01  0:52       ` Bob Rossi
2005-09-01 22:12         ` Mark Kettenis
2005-09-01 23:52           ` Bob Rossi
2005-09-05 19:52           ` Bob Rossi
2005-09-10  4:02             ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=u7jf54htt.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox