Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: MI testsuite to use PTY for inferior
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 20:48:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050802204750.GA14919@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uu0i82hlr.fsf@gnu.org>

On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 11:45:20PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 23:50:20 -0400
> > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> > 
> > Yes, but the problem's that the buffering is in the program being
> > debugged.  It's not the buffering of the GDB MI stream that's the
> > problem, but the fact that the stdout of the program you're debugging
> > would suddenly become block buffered instead of line buffered, if you
> > fed it to a pipe when it expects a TTY.
> 
> This started as a discussion how to separate MI output from the
> debuggee's.  For that, I suggested to redirect MI's output (_not_ the
> debuggee's) to a different file handle.  That should not change the
> buffering of the debuggee's stdout in any way.  While the problem you
> mention is real, it has nothing to do with separation of these two
> streams: if sending the program's output to a pipe changes its
> buffering, we already have that annoyance on Windows.

Ah!  Thank you, I misunderstood your solution.  This is a very
interesting idea indeed.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC


  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-02 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-30  5:54 Nick Roberts
2005-07-30 17:39 ` Bob Rossi
2005-07-30 18:08   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-30 22:47     ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-31  1:19       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-30 22:47   ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-30 23:03     ` Bob Rossi
2005-07-31  1:21       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-31 13:16         ` Bob Rossi
2005-07-31 15:31           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-31 21:20             ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01  1:53               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-01  2:05                 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01  2:15                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-01 11:32                     ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01  3:56               ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-01 11:30                 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01 13:00                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-01 13:16                     ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01 13:23                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-01 13:31                         ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01 14:00                           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-01 14:07                             ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01 18:45                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-01 19:01                     ` Mark Kettenis
2005-08-01 19:25                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-01 19:34                         ` Mark Kettenis
2005-08-01 19:43                           ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-01 20:48                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-01 20:45                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-01 20:52                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-02  3:45                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-02  3:50                             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-02 20:46                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-02 20:48                                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-08-13 17:26                                   ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-13 21:41                                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-31 21:35           ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-31 21:37             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-31 23:32               ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-01  1:51                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-03  2:07         ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-03 12:48           ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-03 13:19           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-03 18:22             ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-03 18:23               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-03 18:24               ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-03 18:32                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-03 19:31                   ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-04  2:23                     ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-04  2:27                       ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-04  4:05                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-04 13:07                           ` Bob Rossi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-27  3:18 Bob Rossi
2005-08-13 22:04 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-08-20  9:07   ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-30  2:55     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-01  0:52       ` Bob Rossi
2005-09-01 22:12         ` Mark Kettenis
2005-09-01 23:52           ` Bob Rossi
2005-09-05 19:52           ` Bob Rossi
2005-09-10  4:02             ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050802204750.GA14919@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox