Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Save the length of inserted breakpoints
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 10:39:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ulkvq36o7.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060303221003.GA21606@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Fri, 3 Mar 2006 17:10:03 -0500)

> Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 17:10:03 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> For the record, it is not a target with peculiarities.  It's an
> architecture with a feature

I don't see the difference.  One man's feature is another's
peculiarity.

> There's a division in GDB between the target, which is a method of
> communication et cetera ("how"), and the architecture, which describes
> "what" is being debugged.

Btw, is this division described anywhere?

> The architecture says "the breakpoint at 0x8000 should be 2 bytes
> long".  The target sets the breakpoint.  The target goes to remove the
> breakpoint, and needs to know how long it was when it was set.

If the issue at hand is just between the architecture and the target,
then why you had to touch breakpoint.[ch] in your patch?  AFAIK,
breakpoint.c belongs to the higher-level GDB layer, above both the
target and the architecture, isn't that so?


  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-04  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-02 22:25 Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-02 23:13 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-03-02 23:19   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-03  0:08     ` Mark Kettenis
2006-03-03  1:21       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-03 13:51   ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-03 15:03     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-03 17:56       ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-03 18:04         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-03 22:00           ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-03 22:10             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-03 22:35               ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-03 23:01                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-04 10:39                   ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2006-03-04 14:58                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-04 15:05                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-04 15:11                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-06 19:49                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-07  5:31               ` Michael Snyder
2006-03-04  0:35             ` Steven Johnson
2006-03-04 10:18               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-11 21:46   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-11 22:32     ` David S. Miller
2006-04-12  7:30     ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-12  9:44     ` Mark Kettenis
2006-04-12 12:57       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-12 18:38         ` Mark Kettenis
2006-04-12 18:47           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-13  8:12             ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-13 22:13               ` Mark Kettenis
2006-04-13 22:59                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-13 23:30                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-14  8:10                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-14  8:52                     ` David S. Miller
2006-04-14  8:04                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-14  8:51                   ` David S. Miller
2006-04-16 23:58                   ` Mark Kettenis
2006-04-17  7:07                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-13 21:57             ` Michael Snyder
2006-04-13 22:59               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-16 23:53                 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-04-16 23:50               ` Mark Kettenis
2006-04-17  1:41                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-17 13:09                   ` Mark Kettenis
2006-04-17 13:37                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-17 13:50                       ` Mark Kettenis
2006-04-17 19:08                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-17 20:25                           ` Mark Kettenis
2006-04-17 21:50                             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-18  8:59                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-18 19:21                             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-19  7:40                               ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ulkvq36o7.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox