From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Save the length of inserted breakpoints
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 23:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060303221003.GA21606@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uoe0n2noj.fsf@gnu.org>
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 12:01:00AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > I find this a little bit strange, since every target will have to do
> > just about the same thing.
>
> We could have a generic method that most of them could use. Those
> that have peculiarities, such as those which started this thread, will
> have to provide their own methods.
For the record, it is not a target with peculiarities. It's an
architecture with a feature (that on the order of four other
GDB-supported architectures have).
There's a division in GDB between the target, which is a method of
communication et cetera ("how"), and the architecture, which describes
"what" is being debugged. It's a quirk of the architecture (all of the
architectures, although none of the others do this sort of heuristic
today) that there are multiple sizes of breakpoints and we can't
statically determine which one we need. It's a requirement of most
targets that we know how big a breakpoint is when inserting or removing
it.
The architecture says "the breakpoint at 0x8000 should be 2 bytes
long". The target sets the breakpoint. The target goes to remove the
breakpoint, and needs to know how long it was when it was set.
If it were contained within either a target or an architecture, the
solution would obviously be much smaller.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-03 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-02 22:25 Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-02 23:13 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-03-02 23:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-03 0:08 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-03-03 1:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-03 13:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-03 15:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-03 17:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-03 18:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-03 22:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-03 22:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-03 22:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-03 23:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-03-04 10:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-04 14:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-04 15:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-04 15:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-06 19:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-07 5:31 ` Michael Snyder
2006-03-04 0:35 ` Steven Johnson
2006-03-04 10:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-11 21:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-11 22:32 ` David S. Miller
2006-04-12 7:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-12 9:44 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-04-12 12:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-12 18:38 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-04-12 18:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-13 8:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-13 22:13 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-04-13 22:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-13 23:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-14 8:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-14 8:52 ` David S. Miller
2006-04-14 8:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-14 8:51 ` David S. Miller
2006-04-16 23:58 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-04-17 7:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-13 21:57 ` Michael Snyder
2006-04-13 22:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-16 23:53 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-04-16 23:50 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-04-17 1:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-17 13:09 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-04-17 13:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-17 13:50 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-04-17 19:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-17 20:25 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-04-17 21:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-18 8:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-18 19:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-19 7:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060303221003.GA21606@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox