* [RFA] Document breakage of Solaris Thread Debugging
@ 2006-06-21 4:57 Joel Brobecker
2006-06-21 5:00 ` Joel Brobecker
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2006-06-21 4:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 296 bytes --]
Hello,
Following the creation of threads/2137, I propose the following addition
to the PROBLEMS file. It's a bit terse, but I don't know more details of
the problem.
2006-06-20 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
* PROBLEMS: Document threads/2137.
OK to apply?
Thanks,
--
Joel
[-- Attachment #2: PROBLEMS.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 653 bytes --]
Index: PROBLEMS
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/PROBLEMS,v
retrieving revision 1.41
diff -u -p -r1.41 PROBLEMS
--- PROBLEMS 8 Nov 2004 15:55:49 -0000 1.41
+++ PROBLEMS 21 Jun 2006 04:54:10 -0000
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
- Known problems in GDB 6.3
+ Known problems in GDB 6.6
See also: http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/
@@ -98,3 +98,7 @@ to an internal error.
This problem does not occur on newer systems that use the NPTL
library, and did not occur with GDB 6.1.
+
+threads/2137: Native Solaris Thread Debugging broken.
+
+Use GDB 6.4 if thread debugging is needed on Solaris.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [RFA] Document breakage of Solaris Thread Debugging
2006-06-21 4:57 [RFA] Document breakage of Solaris Thread Debugging Joel Brobecker
@ 2006-06-21 5:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2006-06-21 17:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-07-12 21:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2006-06-21 5:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
> 2006-06-20 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
>
> * PROBLEMS: Document threads/2137.
Oops, I forgot to mention that I already applied this on the branch.
I thought that we had already done this, but I noticed during the
pre-release routine work that this wasn't the case. So I documented
it the best I could in order to avoid having to wait and then hold
the release for another day.
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA] Document breakage of Solaris Thread Debugging
2006-06-21 4:57 [RFA] Document breakage of Solaris Thread Debugging Joel Brobecker
2006-06-21 5:00 ` Joel Brobecker
@ 2006-06-21 17:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-06-23 3:02 ` Joel Brobecker
2006-07-12 21:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2006-06-21 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb-patches
> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 21:57:03 -0700
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
>
>
> - Known problems in GDB 6.3
> + Known problems in GDB 6.6
Did you really mean "GDB 6.6"?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA] Document breakage of Solaris Thread Debugging
2006-06-21 4:57 [RFA] Document breakage of Solaris Thread Debugging Joel Brobecker
2006-06-21 5:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2006-06-21 17:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2006-07-12 21:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-07-14 22:56 ` Joel Brobecker
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2006-07-12 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 09:57:03PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Following the creation of threads/2137, I propose the following addition
> to the PROBLEMS file. It's a bit terse, but I don't know more details of
> the problem.
>
> 2006-06-20 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
>
> * PROBLEMS: Document threads/2137.
>
> OK to apply?
With the 6.6 -> 6.5 correction this patch is fine.
I think this is another one of those files where you should feel free
to check in patches yourself; the release manager ought to be able to
document issues with the release!
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA] Document breakage of Solaris Thread Debugging
2006-07-12 21:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2006-07-14 22:56 ` Joel Brobecker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2006-07-14 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
> > 2006-06-20 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> >
> > * PROBLEMS: Document threads/2137.
> >
> > OK to apply?
>
> With the 6.6 -> 6.5 correction this patch is fine.
Thanks. Checked in with the correction made.
> I think this is another one of those files where you should feel free
> to check in patches yourself; the release manager ought to be able to
> document issues with the release!
Understood.
Thanks,
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-07-14 22:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-06-21 4:57 [RFA] Document breakage of Solaris Thread Debugging Joel Brobecker
2006-06-21 5:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2006-06-21 17:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-06-23 3:02 ` Joel Brobecker
2006-07-12 21:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-07-14 22:56 ` Joel Brobecker
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox