Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFA] Document breakage of Solaris Thread Debugging
@ 2006-06-21  4:57 Joel Brobecker
  2006-06-21  5:00 ` Joel Brobecker
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2006-06-21  4:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 296 bytes --]

Hello,

Following the creation of threads/2137, I propose the following addition
to the PROBLEMS file. It's a bit terse, but I don't know more details of
the problem.

2006-06-20  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>

        * PROBLEMS: Document threads/2137.

OK to apply?

Thanks,
-- 
Joel

[-- Attachment #2: PROBLEMS.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 653 bytes --]

Index: PROBLEMS
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/PROBLEMS,v
retrieving revision 1.41
diff -u -p -r1.41 PROBLEMS
--- PROBLEMS	8 Nov 2004 15:55:49 -0000	1.41
+++ PROBLEMS	21 Jun 2006 04:54:10 -0000
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 
-			Known problems in GDB 6.3
+			Known problems in GDB 6.6
 
 		See also: http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/
 
@@ -98,3 +98,7 @@ to an internal error.
 
 This problem does not occur on newer systems that use the NPTL
 library, and did not occur with GDB 6.1.
+
+threads/2137: Native Solaris Thread Debugging broken.
+
+Use GDB 6.4 if thread debugging is needed on Solaris.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA] Document breakage of Solaris Thread Debugging
  2006-06-21  4:57 [RFA] Document breakage of Solaris Thread Debugging Joel Brobecker
@ 2006-06-21  5:00 ` Joel Brobecker
  2006-06-21 17:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
  2006-07-12 21:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2006-06-21  5:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

> 2006-06-20  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>
> 
>         * PROBLEMS: Document threads/2137.

Oops, I forgot to mention that I already applied this on the branch.
I thought that we had already done this, but I noticed during the
pre-release routine work that this wasn't the case. So I documented
it the best I could in order to avoid having to wait and then hold
the release for another day.

-- 
Joel


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA] Document breakage of Solaris Thread Debugging
  2006-06-21  4:57 [RFA] Document breakage of Solaris Thread Debugging Joel Brobecker
  2006-06-21  5:00 ` Joel Brobecker
@ 2006-06-21 17:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
  2006-06-23  3:02   ` Joel Brobecker
  2006-07-12 21:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2006-06-21 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb-patches

> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 21:57:03 -0700
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> 
> 
> -			Known problems in GDB 6.3
> +			Known problems in GDB 6.6

Did you really mean "GDB 6.6"?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA] Document breakage of Solaris Thread Debugging
  2006-06-21 17:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2006-06-23  3:02   ` Joel Brobecker
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2006-06-23  3:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: gdb-patches

> > From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> > 
> > 
> > -			Known problems in GDB 6.3
> > +			Known problems in GDB 6.6
> 
> Did you really mean "GDB 6.6"?

Ooops, NO! I meant 6.5. Good catch.

-- 
Joel


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA] Document breakage of Solaris Thread Debugging
  2006-06-21  4:57 [RFA] Document breakage of Solaris Thread Debugging Joel Brobecker
  2006-06-21  5:00 ` Joel Brobecker
  2006-06-21 17:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2006-07-12 21:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  2006-07-14 22:56   ` Joel Brobecker
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2006-07-12 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb-patches

On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 09:57:03PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Following the creation of threads/2137, I propose the following addition
> to the PROBLEMS file. It's a bit terse, but I don't know more details of
> the problem.
> 
> 2006-06-20  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>
> 
>         * PROBLEMS: Document threads/2137.
> 
> OK to apply?

With the 6.6 -> 6.5 correction this patch is fine.

I think this is another one of those files where you should feel free
to check in patches yourself; the release manager ought to be able to
document issues with the release!

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA] Document breakage of Solaris Thread Debugging
  2006-07-12 21:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2006-07-14 22:56   ` Joel Brobecker
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2006-07-14 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

> > 2006-06-20  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>
> > 
> >         * PROBLEMS: Document threads/2137.
> > 
> > OK to apply?
> 
> With the 6.6 -> 6.5 correction this patch is fine.

Thanks. Checked in with the correction made.

> I think this is another one of those files where you should feel free
> to check in patches yourself; the release manager ought to be able to
> document issues with the release!

Understood.

Thanks,
-- 
Joel


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-07-14 22:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-06-21  4:57 [RFA] Document breakage of Solaris Thread Debugging Joel Brobecker
2006-06-21  5:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2006-06-21 17:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-06-23  3:02   ` Joel Brobecker
2006-07-12 21:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-07-14 22:56   ` Joel Brobecker

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox