Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Fred Fish <fnf@specifix.com>, Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ptype problem printing typedefs defined differently in different compilation units
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <u4q35yaqt.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060211183500.GA25132@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Sat, 11 Feb 2006 13:35:00 -0500)

> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 13:35:00 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> The documentation for whatis and ptype leaves me way unenlightened
> about what the difference between them is supposed to be; perhaps we
> should eliminate the difference.

Is the following excerpt from the manual incorrect?  If it's correct,
it seems to answer your question:

    @item ptype @var{expr}
    @itemx ptype
    Print a description of the type of expression @var{expr}.  @code{ptype}
    differs from @code{whatis} by printing a detailed description, instead
    of just the name of the type.

    For example, for this variable declaration:

    @smallexample
    struct complex @{double real; double imag;@} v;
    @end smallexample

    @noindent
    the two commands give this output:

    @smallexample
    @group
    (@value{GDBP}) whatis v
    type = struct complex
    (@value{GDBP}) ptype v
    type = struct complex @{
	double real;
	double imag;
    @}
    @end group
    @end smallexample


  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-11 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-03 20:17 Fred Fish
2006-01-03 23:15 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-04  2:46   ` Fred Fish
2006-01-04  3:45     ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-04 11:15       ` Fred Fish
2006-01-04 21:04       ` Fred Fish
2006-01-05  0:21         ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-05  0:26         ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-05  0:54           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-05  4:47             ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-15 18:48         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-16  4:22           ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-23 15:27             ` Fred Fish
2006-01-23 16:12               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-23 16:43                 ` Fred Fish
2006-01-23 19:17                   ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-23 19:35                     ` Fred Fish
2006-01-23 20:45                       ` Jim Blandy
2006-02-11  0:39                         ` Fred Fish
2006-02-11 18:35                           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-11 19:08                             ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2006-02-11 20:13                               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-11 20:01                             ` Fred Fish
2006-02-11 20:21                               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-12 18:49                                 ` Fred Fish
2006-02-14 14:11                                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-14 18:47                                     ` Fred Fish
2006-02-17  0:17                                     ` Fred Fish
2006-02-17  9:15                                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-17 13:36                                         ` Fred Fish
2006-02-17 20:32                                         ` Fred Fish
2006-02-18  9:27                                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-18 22:19                                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-20 15:47                                       ` Fred Fish
2006-02-20 16:23                                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-17 19:04                                           ` Fred Fish
2006-02-11  0:39                         ` Fred Fish
2006-01-24 15:23                     ` [commit] " Fred Fish

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=u4q35yaqt.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=fnf@specifix.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jimb@red-bean.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox