Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Elliston <bje@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Update to current automake/autoconf/libtool versions.
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 13:59:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3y974upgk.fsf@scooby.brisbane.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A5661C8C-087A-11D7-A7CE-00039396EEB8@apple.com>

>>>>> "Klee" == Klee Dienes <klee@apple.com> writes:

  Klee> The idea here is that it's relatively straightforward for a
  Klee> binutils/gdb maintainer to know what to do when updating a
  Klee> configuration file (get the most recent version of the tools
  Klee> from the FSF and use them), and that we have a natural
  Klee> tendency to stay up-to-date with automake/autoconf changes,
  Klee> without having flag-day style upgrades become an issue.

The flag day has less to do with the binutils and GCC development
process and more to do with Autoconf development.  Some poor decisions
have been made there recently with respect to backward compatibility.

Ben



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Ben Elliston <bje@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Update to current automake/autoconf/libtool versions.
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 13:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3y974upgk.fsf@scooby.brisbane.redhat.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20021205134100.SpCAJLm40nXLaxLu7L7mI_rSxmEqm-yvm8c719EDinA@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A5661C8C-087A-11D7-A7CE-00039396EEB8@apple.com>

>>>>> "Klee" == Klee Dienes <klee@apple.com> writes:

  Klee> The idea here is that it's relatively straightforward for a
  Klee> binutils/gdb maintainer to know what to do when updating a
  Klee> configuration file (get the most recent version of the tools
  Klee> from the FSF and use them), and that we have a natural
  Klee> tendency to stay up-to-date with automake/autoconf changes,
  Klee> without having flag-day style upgrades become an issue.

The flag day has less to do with the binutils and GCC development
process and more to do with Autoconf development.  Some poor decisions
have been made there recently with respect to backward compatibility.

Ben



  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-12-05 21:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-13  8:55 [RFA/PATCH] Darwin fixes for ltconfig, ltcf-c.sh Klee Dienes
2002-11-13  9:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-11-13 10:32   ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-04 22:04     ` [RFC] Update to current automake/autoconf/libtool versions Klee Dienes
2002-12-05  5:26       ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-12-05 14:07         ` Alan Modra
2002-12-05  7:43       ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-05  8:22         ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-05  9:01           ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-05 12:55             ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-05 13:03               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-05 13:13                 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-05 13:16                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-05 13:08               ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-05 13:18                 ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-05  8:28         ` DJ Delorie
2002-12-05  9:37           ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-05  9:42             ` DJ Delorie
2002-12-05 10:28               ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-05  9:31         ` H. J. Lu
2002-12-05  7:44       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-12-05  9:01         ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-05  8:09       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-05  8:29         ` DJ Delorie
2002-12-05  8:35           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-05  8:37             ` DJ Delorie
2002-12-05  8:40             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-12-05  8:44               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-05  9:19                 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-12-05  9:54                 ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-05 10:10                   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-12-05 10:59                   ` Doug Evans
2002-12-05 12:11                     ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-05 12:23                       ` Ian Lance Taylor
2002-12-05 14:29                         ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-06  5:34                     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-12-06  7:25                       ` DJ Delorie
2002-12-06  8:06                         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-12-06  8:47                           ` DJ Delorie
2002-12-05 10:59                   ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-06  5:52                     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-12-05 13:59                   ` Ben Elliston [this message]
2002-12-05 13:41                     ` Ben Elliston
2002-12-30 16:10       ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-12-05 10:15 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-12-05 10:37 ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-05 11:08 Nathanael Nerode
2002-12-05 11:31 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-05 13:31 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-12-05 14:36   ` Alan Modra
2002-12-05 14:56     ` Ian Lance Taylor
2002-12-05 15:22       ` Alan Modra
2002-12-05 15:43         ` Ian Lance Taylor
2002-12-05 15:51           ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-05 15:47         ` Mike Stump
2002-12-05 16:30           ` Alan Modra
2002-12-05 16:45             ` Zack Weinberg
2002-12-08  2:49         ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-05 14:29 ` Christopher Faylor
2002-12-06  6:45 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-12-08 10:53 ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-05 14:40 Nathanael Nerode
2002-12-05 15:19 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-12-06 10:21   ` Tom Tromey
2002-12-07 13:06   ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-12-07 16:03     ` Zack Weinberg
2002-12-09 19:16       ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-12-09 21:52         ` Geoff Keating
2002-12-08 13:11     ` Tom Tromey
2002-12-05 14:42 Joern Rennecke
2002-12-06  5:28 Nathanael Nerode
     [not found] <9A4230D6-1D26-11D7-BFCA-00039396EEB8@apple.com>
2003-01-12 13:22 ` Alexandre Oliva

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3y974upgk.fsf@scooby.brisbane.redhat.com \
    --to=bje@redhat.com \
    --cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox