From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Klee Dienes <klee@apple.com>
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Update to current automake/autoconf/libtool versions.
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 13:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DEFC04E.8050601@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E818ED94-0893-11D7-A7CE-00039396EEB8@apple.com>
> The 3-argument form works with both autoconf-2.13 and autoconf-2.50+.
>
So the three argument form fixes can be committed now?
> I'm not sure I understand the question, but I'll elaborate on the situation a bit in hopes that I can answer it anyway.
>
> Automake-1.4p5 generates Makefile.in's that use the syntax:
>
> ylwrap PROGRAM INPUT [OUTPUT DESIRED]... -- [ARGS]...
>
> Automake-1.7 generates Makefile.in's that use the syntax:
>
> ylwrap INPUT [OUTPUT DESIRED]... -- PROGRAM [ARGS]...
>
> So if we use automake-1.7 to build Makefile.in binutils/ld/gas, we need to use the ylwrap from automake-1.7 as well, which uses the new syntax and therefore requires the change to the GDB Makefile.in. I don't think it's possible to have a version of the GDB Makefile.in that works with both versions.
Right. But can the fixes be committed now (while we potentially twiddle
our thums waiting for the end of the northern winter :-). I get the
feeling that the answer is no. Outch!
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-05 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-13 8:55 [RFA/PATCH] Darwin fixes for ltconfig, ltcf-c.sh Klee Dienes
2002-11-13 9:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-11-13 10:32 ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-04 22:04 ` [RFC] Update to current automake/autoconf/libtool versions Klee Dienes
2002-12-05 5:26 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-12-05 14:07 ` Alan Modra
2002-12-05 7:43 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-05 8:22 ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-05 9:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-05 12:55 ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-05 13:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-05 13:13 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-05 13:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-05 13:08 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-12-05 13:18 ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-05 8:28 ` DJ Delorie
2002-12-05 9:37 ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-05 9:42 ` DJ Delorie
2002-12-05 10:28 ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-05 9:31 ` H. J. Lu
2002-12-05 7:44 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-12-05 9:01 ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-05 8:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-05 8:29 ` DJ Delorie
2002-12-05 8:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-05 8:37 ` DJ Delorie
2002-12-05 8:40 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-12-05 8:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-05 9:19 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-12-05 9:54 ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-05 10:10 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-12-05 10:59 ` Doug Evans
2002-12-05 12:11 ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-05 12:23 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2002-12-05 14:29 ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-06 5:34 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-12-06 7:25 ` DJ Delorie
2002-12-06 8:06 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-12-06 8:47 ` DJ Delorie
2002-12-05 10:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-06 5:52 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-12-05 13:59 ` Ben Elliston
2002-12-05 13:41 ` Ben Elliston
2002-12-30 16:10 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-12-05 10:15 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-12-05 10:37 ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-05 11:08 Nathanael Nerode
2002-12-05 11:31 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-05 13:31 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-12-05 14:36 ` Alan Modra
2002-12-05 14:56 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2002-12-05 15:22 ` Alan Modra
2002-12-05 15:43 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2002-12-05 15:51 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-05 15:47 ` Mike Stump
2002-12-05 16:30 ` Alan Modra
2002-12-05 16:45 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-12-08 2:49 ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-05 14:29 ` Christopher Faylor
2002-12-06 6:45 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-12-08 10:53 ` Klee Dienes
2002-12-05 14:40 Nathanael Nerode
2002-12-05 15:19 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-12-06 10:21 ` Tom Tromey
2002-12-07 13:06 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-12-07 16:03 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-12-09 19:16 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-12-09 21:52 ` Geoff Keating
2002-12-08 13:11 ` Tom Tromey
2002-12-05 14:42 Joern Rennecke
2002-12-06 5:28 Nathanael Nerode
[not found] <9A4230D6-1D26-11D7-BFCA-00039396EEB8@apple.com>
2003-01-12 13:22 ` Alexandre Oliva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DEFC04E.8050601@redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=klee@apple.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox