From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [MI] -stack-list-variables
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:24:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3tyyw1a9l.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200909212116.49156.vladimir@codesourcery.com> (Vladimir Prus's message of "Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:16:48 +0400")
>>>>> "Volodya" == Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com> writes:
Tom> I agree that this is true in the general case. But, in this specific
Tom> case, adding the attribute seems harmless.
Volodya> There's about 10 different attributes we can also print, and they will
Volodya> be likewise harmless. Should we add them all?
Sure, if someone asks for them.
Furthermore, this is a bogus line of argumentation. There is no
slippery slope here, there is a specific feature under discussion.
Volodya> I am frankly surprised by the amount of support for this feature, and
Volodya> the fact that this support say this is harmless, and possibly
Volodya> useful, but does not name any single frontend that actually separates
Volodya> arguments from "true" locals.
Apparently Nick wants it for Emacs.
Personally, I agree, it is useless to distinguish them. I can't
remember ever caring about this distinction, and quite to the contrary,
I am often irritated that the CLI makes it.
If Nick does not in fact want this for Emacs, then yes, I agree, don't
bother.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-21 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-19 10:12 Vladimir Prus
2009-09-19 10:13 ` Vladimir Prus
2009-09-19 10:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-09-19 11:15 ` Vladimir Prus
2009-09-19 15:45 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-19 15:46 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-19 22:41 ` -stack-list-variables Nick Roberts
2009-09-20 6:18 ` [MI] -stack-list-variables Vladimir Prus
2009-09-20 22:05 ` Nick Roberts
2009-09-21 5:14 ` Vladimir Prus
2009-09-21 7:13 ` Nick Roberts
2009-09-21 7:39 ` Vladimir Prus
2009-09-21 15:29 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-21 16:02 ` Vladimir Prus
2009-09-21 16:27 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-21 16:54 ` Vladimir Prus
2009-09-21 17:04 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-21 17:17 ` Vladimir Prus
2009-09-21 17:24 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2009-09-21 17:03 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-21 22:10 ` Nick Roberts
2009-09-22 5:31 ` Vladimir Prus
2009-09-22 14:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-09-29 6:35 ` Vladimir Prus
2009-09-29 23:27 ` Nick Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3tyyw1a9l.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=vladimir@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox