* [patch] Fix *.log tests merged output containing "==="
@ 2010-03-08 23:10 Jan Kratochvil
2010-03-22 19:40 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kratochvil @ 2010-03-08 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches, gcc-patches
Hi,
while *.sum files were OK the *.log files sometimes miss the content present
in *.sum results. For example gdb.base/bitfields.exp output was missing while
gdb.base/bitfields.exp output was present.
It got broken if arbitrary "===" string has appeared in the tests output.
Grepped dejagnu the proposed more strict pattern should match fine:
$ grep === `rpm -ql dejagnu`
/usr/share/dejagnu/framework.exp: clone_output "\n\t\t=== $tool Summary for $current_target_name ===\n"
/usr/share/dejagnu/framework.exp: clone_output "\n\t\t=== $tool Summary ===\n"
/usr/share/dejagnu/runtest.exp:clone_output "\n\t\t=== $tool tests ===\n"
For GDB `grep '^Running ' gdb.log | wc -l' changes 1770 -> 1818.
For GCC `cat *.log | wc -l' changes 444633 -> 482178.
(checked the output change looks OK for both cases)
I am not aware why there was "/\===/" instead of just "/===/".
OK to check-in? (GCC + GDB approval requested)
Thanks,
Jan
gdb/testsuite/ | contrib/
2010-03-08 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Fix *.log tests output containing "===".
* dg-extract-results.sh (/\===/): Rename to ...
(/^\t\t=== .* ===$/): ... this pattern.
--- a/gdb/testsuite/dg-extract-results.sh
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/dg-extract-results.sh
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ BEGIN {
next
}
}
-/\===/ { curvar = ""; next }
+/^\t\t=== .* ===$/ { curvar = ""; next }
/^(PASS|XPASS|FAIL|XFAIL|UNRESOLVED|WARNING|ERROR|UNSUPPORTED|UNTESTED|KFAIL):/ {
testname=\$2
# Ugly hack for gfortran.dg/dg.exp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] Fix *.log tests merged output containing "==="
2010-03-08 23:10 [patch] Fix *.log tests merged output containing "===" Jan Kratochvil
@ 2010-03-22 19:40 ` Tom Tromey
2010-03-22 20:24 ` Jan Kratochvil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2010-03-22 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kratochvil; +Cc: gdb-patches, gcc-patches
>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
Jan> while *.sum files were OK the *.log files sometimes miss the
Jan> content present in *.sum results. For example
Jan> gdb.base/bitfields.exp output was missing while
Jan> gdb.base/bitfields.exp output was present.
Jan> OK to check-in? (GCC + GDB approval requested)
This is ok for gdb as well.
Thanks.
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] Fix *.log tests merged output containing "==="
2010-03-22 19:40 ` Tom Tromey
@ 2010-03-22 20:24 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-03-22 20:26 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kratochvil @ 2010-03-22 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:39:53 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
>
> Jan> while *.sum files were OK the *.log files sometimes miss the
> Jan> content present in *.sum results. For example
> Jan> gdb.base/bitfields.exp output was missing while
> Jan> gdb.base/bitfields.exp output was present.
>
> Jan> OK to check-in? (GCC + GDB approval requested)
>
> This is ok for gdb as well.
> Thanks.
I see now I would rather sync it with gcc, OK to check in this way?
(I should have asked differently in the first place.)
Thanks,
Jan
2010-03-22 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* dg-extract-results.sh: Sync with GCC HEAD (import r155655, r157175
and r157645).
--- gdbhead/gdb/testsuite/dg-extract-results.sh 2010-03-08 23:57:02.000000000 +0100
+++ gcchead/contrib/dg-extract-results.sh 2010-03-22 18:35:18.000000000 +0100
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
# The resulting file can be used with test result comparison scripts for
# results from tests that were run in parallel. See usage() below.
-# Copyright (C) 2008, 2009 Free Software Foundation
+# Copyright (C) 2008, 2009, 2010 Free Software Foundation
# Contributed by Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com>
#
# This file is part of GCC.
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ BEGIN {
next
}
}
-/\===/ { curvar = ""; next }
+/^\t\t=== .* ===$/ { curvar = ""; next }
/^(PASS|XPASS|FAIL|XFAIL|UNRESOLVED|WARNING|ERROR|UNSUPPORTED|UNTESTED|KFAIL):/ {
testname=\$2
# Ugly hack for gfortran.dg/dg.exp
@@ -365,8 +365,8 @@ BEGIN {
END {
printf ("\t\t=== %s Summary for %s ===\n\n", tool, variant)
if (passcnt != 0) printf ("# of expected passes\t\t%d\n", passcnt)
- if (xpasscnt != 0) printf ("# of unexpected successes\t%d\n", xpasscnt)
if (failcnt != 0) printf ("# of unexpected failures\t%d\n", failcnt)
+ if (xpasscnt != 0) printf ("# of unexpected successes\t%d\n", xpasscnt)
if (xfailcnt != 0) printf ("# of expected failures\t\t%d\n", xfailcnt)
if (untstcnt != 0) printf ("# of untested testcases\t\t%d\n", untstcnt)
if (unrescnt != 0) printf ("# of unresolved testcases\t%d\n", unrescnt)
@@ -418,6 +418,6 @@ cat ${TMP}/var-* | $AWK -f $TOTAL_AWK
# This is ugly, but if there's version output from the compiler under test
# at the end of the file, we want it. The other thing that might be there
# is the final summary counts.
-tail -n 2 $FIRST_SUM | grep -q '^#' || tail -n 2 $FIRST_SUM
+tail -2 $FIRST_SUM | grep -q '^#' || tail -2 $FIRST_SUM
exit 0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] Fix *.log tests merged output containing "==="
2010-03-22 20:24 ` Jan Kratochvil
@ 2010-03-22 20:26 ` Tom Tromey
2010-03-22 20:41 ` Jan Kratochvil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2010-03-22 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kratochvil; +Cc: gdb-patches
>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
Jan> I see now I would rather sync it with gcc, OK to check in this way?
Yes, thanks.
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] Fix *.log tests merged output containing "==="
2010-03-22 20:26 ` Tom Tromey
@ 2010-03-22 20:41 ` Jan Kratochvil
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kratochvil @ 2010-03-22 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:26:32 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
>
> Jan> I see now I would rather sync it with gcc, OK to check in this way?
>
> Yes, thanks.
Checked-in:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2010-03/msg00204.html
It has imported these patches:
r155655 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00340.html
r157175 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg00125.html
r157645 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg00309.html
Thanks,
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-22 20:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-03-08 23:10 [patch] Fix *.log tests merged output containing "===" Jan Kratochvil
2010-03-22 19:40 ` Tom Tromey
2010-03-22 20:24 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-03-22 20:26 ` Tom Tromey
2010-03-22 20:41 ` Jan Kratochvil
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox