* [patch] Fix *.log tests merged output containing "==="
@ 2010-03-08 23:10 Jan Kratochvil
2010-03-22 19:40 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kratochvil @ 2010-03-08 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches, gcc-patches
Hi,
while *.sum files were OK the *.log files sometimes miss the content present
in *.sum results. For example gdb.base/bitfields.exp output was missing while
gdb.base/bitfields.exp output was present.
It got broken if arbitrary "===" string has appeared in the tests output.
Grepped dejagnu the proposed more strict pattern should match fine:
$ grep === `rpm -ql dejagnu`
/usr/share/dejagnu/framework.exp: clone_output "\n\t\t=== $tool Summary for $current_target_name ===\n"
/usr/share/dejagnu/framework.exp: clone_output "\n\t\t=== $tool Summary ===\n"
/usr/share/dejagnu/runtest.exp:clone_output "\n\t\t=== $tool tests ===\n"
For GDB `grep '^Running ' gdb.log | wc -l' changes 1770 -> 1818.
For GCC `cat *.log | wc -l' changes 444633 -> 482178.
(checked the output change looks OK for both cases)
I am not aware why there was "/\===/" instead of just "/===/".
OK to check-in? (GCC + GDB approval requested)
Thanks,
Jan
gdb/testsuite/ | contrib/
2010-03-08 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Fix *.log tests output containing "===".
* dg-extract-results.sh (/\===/): Rename to ...
(/^\t\t=== .* ===$/): ... this pattern.
--- a/gdb/testsuite/dg-extract-results.sh
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/dg-extract-results.sh
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ BEGIN {
next
}
}
-/\===/ { curvar = ""; next }
+/^\t\t=== .* ===$/ { curvar = ""; next }
/^(PASS|XPASS|FAIL|XFAIL|UNRESOLVED|WARNING|ERROR|UNSUPPORTED|UNTESTED|KFAIL):/ {
testname=\$2
# Ugly hack for gfortran.dg/dg.exp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [patch] Fix *.log tests merged output containing "===" 2010-03-08 23:10 [patch] Fix *.log tests merged output containing "===" Jan Kratochvil @ 2010-03-22 19:40 ` Tom Tromey 2010-03-22 20:24 ` Jan Kratochvil 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Tom Tromey @ 2010-03-22 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Kratochvil; +Cc: gdb-patches, gcc-patches >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes: Jan> while *.sum files were OK the *.log files sometimes miss the Jan> content present in *.sum results. For example Jan> gdb.base/bitfields.exp output was missing while Jan> gdb.base/bitfields.exp output was present. Jan> OK to check-in? (GCC + GDB approval requested) This is ok for gdb as well. Thanks. Tom ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] Fix *.log tests merged output containing "===" 2010-03-22 19:40 ` Tom Tromey @ 2010-03-22 20:24 ` Jan Kratochvil 2010-03-22 20:26 ` Tom Tromey 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Jan Kratochvil @ 2010-03-22 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: gdb-patches On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:39:53 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes: > > Jan> while *.sum files were OK the *.log files sometimes miss the > Jan> content present in *.sum results. For example > Jan> gdb.base/bitfields.exp output was missing while > Jan> gdb.base/bitfields.exp output was present. > > Jan> OK to check-in? (GCC + GDB approval requested) > > This is ok for gdb as well. > Thanks. I see now I would rather sync it with gcc, OK to check in this way? (I should have asked differently in the first place.) Thanks, Jan 2010-03-22 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> * dg-extract-results.sh: Sync with GCC HEAD (import r155655, r157175 and r157645). --- gdbhead/gdb/testsuite/dg-extract-results.sh 2010-03-08 23:57:02.000000000 +0100 +++ gcchead/contrib/dg-extract-results.sh 2010-03-22 18:35:18.000000000 +0100 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ # The resulting file can be used with test result comparison scripts for # results from tests that were run in parallel. See usage() below. -# Copyright (C) 2008, 2009 Free Software Foundation +# Copyright (C) 2008, 2009, 2010 Free Software Foundation # Contributed by Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com> # # This file is part of GCC. @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ BEGIN { next } } -/\===/ { curvar = ""; next } +/^\t\t=== .* ===$/ { curvar = ""; next } /^(PASS|XPASS|FAIL|XFAIL|UNRESOLVED|WARNING|ERROR|UNSUPPORTED|UNTESTED|KFAIL):/ { testname=\$2 # Ugly hack for gfortran.dg/dg.exp @@ -365,8 +365,8 @@ BEGIN { END { printf ("\t\t=== %s Summary for %s ===\n\n", tool, variant) if (passcnt != 0) printf ("# of expected passes\t\t%d\n", passcnt) - if (xpasscnt != 0) printf ("# of unexpected successes\t%d\n", xpasscnt) if (failcnt != 0) printf ("# of unexpected failures\t%d\n", failcnt) + if (xpasscnt != 0) printf ("# of unexpected successes\t%d\n", xpasscnt) if (xfailcnt != 0) printf ("# of expected failures\t\t%d\n", xfailcnt) if (untstcnt != 0) printf ("# of untested testcases\t\t%d\n", untstcnt) if (unrescnt != 0) printf ("# of unresolved testcases\t%d\n", unrescnt) @@ -418,6 +418,6 @@ cat ${TMP}/var-* | $AWK -f $TOTAL_AWK # This is ugly, but if there's version output from the compiler under test # at the end of the file, we want it. The other thing that might be there # is the final summary counts. -tail -n 2 $FIRST_SUM | grep -q '^#' || tail -n 2 $FIRST_SUM +tail -2 $FIRST_SUM | grep -q '^#' || tail -2 $FIRST_SUM exit 0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] Fix *.log tests merged output containing "===" 2010-03-22 20:24 ` Jan Kratochvil @ 2010-03-22 20:26 ` Tom Tromey 2010-03-22 20:41 ` Jan Kratochvil 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Tom Tromey @ 2010-03-22 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Kratochvil; +Cc: gdb-patches >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes: Jan> I see now I would rather sync it with gcc, OK to check in this way? Yes, thanks. Tom ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] Fix *.log tests merged output containing "===" 2010-03-22 20:26 ` Tom Tromey @ 2010-03-22 20:41 ` Jan Kratochvil 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Jan Kratochvil @ 2010-03-22 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: gdb-patches On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:26:32 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes: > > Jan> I see now I would rather sync it with gcc, OK to check in this way? > > Yes, thanks. Checked-in: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2010-03/msg00204.html It has imported these patches: r155655 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00340.html r157175 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg00125.html r157645 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg00309.html Thanks, Jan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-22 20:41 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-03-08 23:10 [patch] Fix *.log tests merged output containing "===" Jan Kratochvil 2010-03-22 19:40 ` Tom Tromey 2010-03-22 20:24 ` Jan Kratochvil 2010-03-22 20:26 ` Tom Tromey 2010-03-22 20:41 ` Jan Kratochvil
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox