Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix PR breakpoints/16889: gdb segfaults when printing ASM SDT arguments

[Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>]

On Friday, May 02 2014, Pedro Alves wrote:

> FYI, with {} instead of [list ...] one can avoid the backslashes.
> That is, one can write:
>
>  foreach probe_name {foo bar foo_prefix bar_prefix} \
>      probe_val {42 42 42 42} \
>      probe_reg_val {"$rsp" "$rbp - 8" "$rsp" "$rbp - 8"} {
>
> instead of:
>
>  foreach probe_name [list "foo" "bar" "foo_prefix" "bar_prefix"] \
>      probe_val [list "42" "42" "42" "42"] \
>      probe_reg_val [list "\$rsp" "\$rbp - 8" "\$rsp" "\$rbp - 8"] {
>      with_test_prefix $probe_name {
>
> Just a suggestion, it doesn't matter at all.

Thanks for the suggestion.  I actually knew about it, but believe it or
not I prefer to use [list ...] instead of { } in this case, because I
think it is more elegant.  Go figure...

Anyway, pushed:

  <https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2014-05/msg00004.html>

Thanks,

-- 
Sergio