From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-112186-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 15303 invoked by alias); 2 May 2014 20:57:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 15286 invoked by uid 89); 2 May 2014 20:57:06 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 May 2014 20:57:05 +0000
Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s42Kv4LG004111	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK)	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Fri, 2 May 2014 16:57:04 -0400
Received: from psique ([10.3.113.6])	by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s42Kv1Yv023033	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);	Fri, 2 May 2014 16:57:03 -0400
From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix PR breakpoints/16889: gdb segfaults when printing ASM SDT arguments
References: <1398981131-11720-1-git-send-email-sergiodj@redhat.com>	<1398981131-11720-2-git-send-email-sergiodj@redhat.com>	<53636901.9090601@redhat.com> <m3lhuk40pm.fsf@redhat.com>	<m3oazg2gys.fsf@redhat.com> <5363EA5A.1000209@redhat.com>
X-URL: http://www.redhat.com
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 20:57:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <5363EA5A.1000209@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 02	May 2014 19:56:26 +0100")
Message-ID: <m3iopn292b.fsf@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2

On Friday, May 02 2014, Pedro Alves wrote:

> FYI, with {} instead of [list ...] one can avoid the backslashes.
> That is, one can write:
>
>  foreach probe_name {foo bar foo_prefix bar_prefix} \
>      probe_val {42 42 42 42} \
>      probe_reg_val {"$rsp" "$rbp - 8" "$rsp" "$rbp - 8"} {
>
> instead of:
>
>  foreach probe_name [list "foo" "bar" "foo_prefix" "bar_prefix"] \
>      probe_val [list "42" "42" "42" "42"] \
>      probe_reg_val [list "\$rsp" "\$rbp - 8" "\$rsp" "\$rbp - 8"] {
>      with_test_prefix $probe_name {
>
> Just a suggestion, it doesn't matter at all.

Thanks for the suggestion.  I actually knew about it, but believe it or
not I prefer to use [list ...] instead of { } in this case, because I
think it is more elegant.  Go figure...

Anyway, pushed:

  <https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2014-05/msg00004.html>

Thanks,

-- 
Sergio