From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Doug Evans <dje@google.com>,
Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Add "debug jit" for easier tracing of JIT support internals
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 19:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3hbdlrf46.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201101052334.13475.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Wed, 5 Jan 2011 23:33:48 +0000")
>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:
Pedro> An alternative I can think of, would be to come up with a GDB specific
Pedro> printf formatter for "replace by the value of the setting", and then
Pedro> instead of a code callback, we'd install a show string. That is,
Pedro> data driven instead of code driven, so instead, we'd register
Pedro> the command like:
Pedro> add_setshow_zinteger_cmd ("jit", class_maintenance, &jit_debug, _("\
Pedro> Set JIT debugging."), _("\
Pedro> Show JIT debugging."), _("\
Pedro> When non-zero, JIT debugging is enabled."),
Pedro> NULL,
Pedro> _("\
Pedro> JIT debugging is: %V"),
Pedro> &setdebuglist, &showdebuglist);
Pedro> With %V being the new format string in question.
Pedro> We'd still need to write the "show" string, but it's more
Pedro> centralized and readable than putting it in a separate callback
Pedro> function.
Could we go even further, and just specify the name of the parameter and
then some generic documentation about it? The set- and show-docs are
usually pretty useless.
Something like:
add_setshow_zinteger_cmd ("jit", class_maintenance, &jit_debug,
_("JIT debugging"),
_("When non-zero, JIT debugging is enabled."),
&setdebuglist, &showdebuglist);
Then:
(gdb) help show debug jit
Show the "JIT debugging" setting.
Usage: show debug jit
When non-zero, JIT debugging is enabled.
(gdb) help set debug jit
Set the "JIT debugging" setting.
Usage: set debug jit VALUE
When non-zero, JIT debugging is enabled.
(gdb) show debug jit
The "JIT debugging" setting is currently 0.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-06 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-05 19:36 Paul Pluzhnikov
2011-01-05 20:02 ` Doug Evans
2011-01-05 22:57 ` Pedro Alves
2011-01-05 23:16 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2011-01-05 23:28 ` Pedro Alves
2011-01-05 23:49 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2011-01-06 0:45 ` Pedro Alves
2011-01-06 1:09 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2011-01-06 4:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-05 23:26 ` Doug Evans
2011-01-05 23:34 ` Pedro Alves
2011-01-06 19:45 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2011-01-06 19:52 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2011-01-05 20:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-05 21:53 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2011-01-05 22:51 ` Pedro Alves
2011-01-06 4:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3hbdlrf46.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=ppluzhnikov@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox