From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com>,
Jan Kratochvil <jkratoch@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: RFA: rewrite dwarf->ax translator
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 22:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m38w6pgmz1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m38w6pi5l5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:20:54 -0600")
>>> Built and regtested on x86-64 (compile farm).
Pedro> I'm not sure whether testing natively actually exercises anything
Pedro> regarding bytecode generation. The gdb.trace/ tests are mostly
Pedro> skipped in that case. Did you try testing this against a
Pedro> x86|x86-64 gdbserver?
Tom> No. I will do that.
The results look good to me.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-08 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-18 23:43 RFC: implement DW_OP_bit_piece Tom Tromey
2010-05-19 14:16 ` Stan Shebs
2010-05-19 23:35 ` Tom Tromey
2010-05-20 3:29 ` Stan Shebs
2010-05-20 5:10 ` Tom Tromey
2010-05-20 7:12 ` Tom Tromey
2010-05-26 22:41 ` Tom Tromey
2010-06-03 20:12 ` RFA: rewrite dwarf->ax translator (Was: RFC: implement DW_OP_bit_piece) Tom Tromey
2010-06-08 20:45 ` RFA: rewrite dwarf->ax translator Tom Tromey
2010-06-11 15:20 ` Tom Tromey
2010-06-08 20:52 ` RFA: rewrite dwarf->ax translator (Was: RFC: implement DW_OP_bit_piece) Pedro Alves
2010-06-08 21:21 ` RFA: rewrite dwarf->ax translator Tom Tromey
2010-06-08 22:48 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2010-06-09 14:04 ` Pedro Alves
2010-07-01 12:43 ` collecting optimized out variables regression (Re: RFA: rewrite dwarf->ax translator (Was: RFC: implement DW_OP_bit_piece)) Pedro Alves
2010-07-01 15:25 ` collecting optimized out variables regression (Re: RFA: rewrite dwarf->ax translator Tom Tromey
2010-07-01 15:57 ` Pedro Alves
2010-07-01 15:34 ` collecting optimized out variables regression (Re: RFA: rewrite dwarf->ax translator (Was: RFC: implement DW_OP_bit_piece)) Jan Kratochvil
2010-05-20 19:53 ` RFC: implement DW_OP_bit_piece Tom Tromey
2010-05-20 20:30 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-05-21 20:16 ` Tom Tromey
2010-05-21 21:16 ` Stan Shebs
2010-05-21 21:18 ` Tom Tromey
2010-05-25 19:22 ` RFC: DWARF expression disassembly (Was: RFC: implement DW_OP_bit_piece) Tom Tromey
2010-05-25 19:27 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-05-25 20:25 ` RFC: DWARF expression disassembly Tom Tromey
2010-05-25 20:52 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-05-25 22:03 ` Tom Tromey
2010-05-26 17:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-06-01 18:36 ` Tom Tromey
2010-06-01 18:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-06-02 19:32 ` Tom Tromey
2010-05-20 21:07 ` RFC: implement DW_OP_bit_piece Jan Kratochvil
2010-05-21 17:57 ` Tom Tromey
2010-05-25 18:19 ` performance talk [Re: RFC: implement DW_OP_bit_piece] Jan Kratochvil
2010-05-25 22:23 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m38w6pgmz1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jkratoch@redhat.com \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=stan@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox