From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13395 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2010 22:48:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 13384 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jun 2010 22:48:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 22:48:37 +0000 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o58MmSLX003626 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:48:28 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o58MmN7M021575; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:48:23 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o58MmMtf023933; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:48:22 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6A3AC3782A2; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 16:48:20 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Stan Shebs , Jan Kratochvil Subject: Re: RFA: rewrite dwarf->ax translator References: <201006082151.50734.pedro@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 22:48:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Tom Tromey's message of "Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:20:54 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00220.txt.bz2 >>> Built and regtested on x86-64 (compile farm). Pedro> I'm not sure whether testing natively actually exercises anything Pedro> regarding bytecode generation. The gdb.trace/ tests are mostly Pedro> skipped in that case. Did you try testing this against a Pedro> x86|x86-64 gdbserver? Tom> No. I will do that. The results look good to me. Tom