Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Questions about contributing new port
@ 2013-06-05  3:09 Wei-cheng Wang
  2013-06-05  3:19 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wei-cheng Wang @ 2013-06-05  3:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

Hi,

We are going to contribute our new port, nds32 architecture, on behalf of
AndesTech.
Just ask in advance, does it mean we should submit them all before
2013-09-07 for GDB-7.7 branch?
And since GDB requires bfd/opcodes, we should submit our binutils port
before GDB?

Thanks

Wei-cheng


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Questions about contributing new port
  2013-06-05  3:09 Questions about contributing new port Wei-cheng Wang
@ 2013-06-05  3:19 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
  2013-06-05  6:20   ` Joel Brobecker
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sergio Durigan Junior @ 2013-06-05  3:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wei-cheng Wang; +Cc: gdb-patches

On Wednesday, June 05 2013, Wei-cheng Wang wrote:

> We are going to contribute our new port, nds32 architecture, on behalf of
> AndesTech.
> Just ask in advance, does it mean we should submit them all before
> 2013-09-07 for GDB-7.7 branch?

Hi Wei-cheng,

I am not sure I understand the motivation behind your question, but IMO
you could send the patches right away if they're ready (which I assume
so, from what you wrote).  No need to wait after the release of 7.7,
also because it will take some time until there...

> And since GDB requires bfd/opcodes, we should submit our binutils port
> before GDB?

What I would do is to contribute the patches at the same time, maybe as
part of a patch series, with the first part being directed to binutils,
and the other parts to GDB.  I'm not a maintainer though, so you may
wait some days before you start sending things.

Thanks,

-- 
Sergio


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Questions about contributing new port
  2013-06-05  3:19 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
@ 2013-06-05  6:20   ` Joel Brobecker
  2013-06-05  6:49     ` Wei-cheng Wang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2013-06-05  6:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sergio Durigan Junior; +Cc: Wei-cheng Wang, gdb-patches

Since Sergio qualified his answer with "I am not a Maintainer", I wanted
to confirm that I agree with Sergio's advice. :-)

I also wanted to add:

> I am not sure I understand the motivation behind your question, but IMO
> you could send the patches right away if they're ready (which I assume
> so, from what you wrote).  No need to wait after the release of 7.7,
> also because it will take some time until there...

Please also verify that you have copyright assignment papers all done
with the FSF, or else start the process now, as it takes a bit of time.

-- 
Joel


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Questions about contributing new port
  2013-06-05  6:20   ` Joel Brobecker
@ 2013-06-05  6:49     ` Wei-cheng Wang
  2013-06-05  7:22       ` Joel Brobecker
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wei-cheng Wang @ 2013-06-05  6:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: Sergio Durigan Junior, gdb-patches

Hi Joel and Sergio,

Thank you for your quick reply :)

Yes, we've signed FSF agreement years ago.
And the first question I asked is about
if we want our port included in GDB-7.7,
then we should hurry up and send them before 7.7 branch created.
Am I right?

Thanks.

Wei-cheng

On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
> Since Sergio qualified his answer with "I am not a Maintainer", I wanted
> to confirm that I agree with Sergio's advice. :-)
>
> I also wanted to add:
>
>> I am not sure I understand the motivation behind your question, but IMO
>> you could send the patches right away if they're ready (which I assume
>> so, from what you wrote).  No need to wait after the release of 7.7,
>> also because it will take some time until there...
>
> Please also verify that you have copyright assignment papers all done
> with the FSF, or else start the process now, as it takes a bit of time.
>
> --
> Joel


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Questions about contributing new port
  2013-06-05  6:49     ` Wei-cheng Wang
@ 2013-06-05  7:22       ` Joel Brobecker
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2013-06-05  7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wei-cheng Wang; +Cc: Sergio Durigan Junior, gdb-patches

> Yes, we've signed FSF agreement years ago.
> And the first question I asked is about
> if we want our port included in GDB-7.7,
> then we should hurry up and send them before 7.7 branch created.
> Am I right?

Most certainly. Sending ASAP will help increase your changes of
seeing these changes be part of 7.7. Whether it actually makes it
to 7.7 is a little bit dependent on a number of factors mostly
around complexity of your code, and the amount of comments and
change requests generated during the review process...

-- 
Joel


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-05  7:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-06-05  3:09 Questions about contributing new port Wei-cheng Wang
2013-06-05  3:19 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2013-06-05  6:20   ` Joel Brobecker
2013-06-05  6:49     ` Wei-cheng Wang
2013-06-05  7:22       ` Joel Brobecker

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox