From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] Add -s option to source command.
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:49:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <j2ye394668d1004091249m78149f10ge00ed6470c3526cd@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83iq80zali.fsf@gnu.org>
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:12:27 -0700
>> From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
>> Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>>
>> > This is fine, but what if @var{filename} is @file{d:/foo/myscript} (on
>> > Windows)?
>>
>> source.c:openp() doesn't handle that case, it just blindly concatenates.
>> [presumably because it hasn't needed to]
>>
>> I don't have an opinion on what *should* happen here.
>> Possibilities are to either not try or remove the drive spec.
>
> My vote is for removing the drive letter. The other alternative means
> that absolute file names are handled inconsistently across platforms
> (I assume that not trying to look for absolute file name on Posix
> platforms will not be a useful behavior).
>
I can make a case for either choice on Posix platforms: ie. whether to
search or to not search. I don't know which is better, but openp()
already does the search for absolute path names (if
OPF_SEARCH_IN_PATH is specified), so I lean towards not introducing
something new.
Does anyone know if there's existing code to strip a drive letter if present?
[It's trivial to do - but I fear the discussion involved in getting a
patch in that does it The Right Way.]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-09 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-06 21:58 Doug Evans
2010-04-06 23:17 ` Doug Evans
2010-04-07 20:14 ` Tom Tromey
2010-04-08 22:49 ` Doug Evans
2010-04-08 23:09 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2010-04-09 0:13 ` Doug Evans
2010-04-09 17:15 ` Tom Tromey
2010-04-09 17:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-04-10 1:29 ` Joel Brobecker
2010-04-09 7:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-04-09 17:23 ` Doug Evans
2010-04-09 17:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-04-09 18:12 ` Doug Evans
2010-04-09 19:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-04-09 19:49 ` Doug Evans [this message]
2010-04-12 17:31 ` Doug Evans
2010-04-12 17:33 ` Doug Evans
2010-04-12 17:47 ` Tom Tromey
2010-04-12 17:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-04-14 22:01 ` Doug Evans
2010-04-15 3:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-04-09 17:13 ` Tom Tromey
2010-04-09 17:15 ` Doug Evans
2010-04-09 17:19 ` Tom Tromey
2010-04-17 15:20 ` H.J. Lu
2010-04-20 5:38 ` Doug Evans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=j2ye394668d1004091249m78149f10ge00ed6470c3526cd@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dje@google.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox