Re: x86-64-tdep.h cleanup

[Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>]

Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> writes:

> On Mar 5,  4:56pm, Michal Ludvig wrote:
>
>> As it was recommended by lots of people here I moved <sys/reg.h> along 
>> with regmap from x86-64-tdep.h to x86-64-linux-nat.c.
>> Also to let x86-64-tdep.h contain only #defines, I moved declarations of 
>> x86_64_linux_frame_saved_pc and x86_64_linux_saved_pc_after_call to 
>> x86-64-tdep.c. Are these changes OK to commit?
>> 
>> Michal Ludvig
>> 
>> Index: ChangeLog
>> from Michal Ludvig  <mludvig@suse.cz>
>> 
>> * x86-64-tdep.h (sys/reg.h, x86_64_regmap): Moved to x86-64-linux-nat.c
>> (x86_64_linux_frame_saved_pc,
>> x86_64_linux_saved_pc_after_call): Moved to x86-64-tdep.c
>> * x86-64-linux-nat.c (sys/reg.h, x86_64_regmap): Moved here
>> from x86-64-tdep.h
>> * x86-64-tdep.c (x86_64_linux_frame_saved_pc,
>> x86_64_linux_saved_pc_after_call): Moved here from x86-64-tdep.h
>
>
> Michael,
>
> I'm not the maintainer of the files in questions, but your changes
> look okay to me.

Since x86-64 is currently not officially (according to GDB
maintainership rules) by anybody, you have the right to ok this
change.  Is this an approval?

Thanks,
Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj