From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Another proposal for frontends and queries.
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <h8koka$oub$2@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC5153600766@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
Marc Khouzam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm starting a new thread in an attempt to get this issue resolved before 7.0.
>
> Three-line recap of the issue:
>
> For some frontends queries are answered automatically by GDB.
> Because of this, some actions that the frontends wants to trigger
> are automatically cancelled by GDB.
...
> My latest idea, based on the reactions to the previous suggestions
> is to extend "set confirm" and add a new "force" option.
> set confirm on/off would remain as before
> set confirm force would automatically answer 'y' to all queries.
So, the current problem is that some queries for which the frontend
wants implicit 'yes' are answered as 'no'. You propose an option to
make all queries answered as 'yes'. What if frontend wants some query
answered as 'no'?
- Volodya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-14 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-14 2:38 Marc Khouzam
2009-09-14 6:45 ` Vladimir Prus [this message]
2009-09-14 13:07 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-14 14:09 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-14 14:28 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-14 14:48 ` Pedro Alves
2009-09-14 14:57 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-14 15:08 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-14 15:36 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-14 16:06 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-15 16:26 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-16 6:24 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-16 12:38 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-16 13:06 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-16 13:25 ` Pedro Alves
2009-09-16 13:46 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-16 13:59 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-16 14:17 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-16 14:26 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-16 14:34 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-16 14:45 ` Pedro Alves
2009-09-16 14:43 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-16 18:03 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-16 23:36 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-16 23:40 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-16 17:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-09-14 15:23 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-16 20:20 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-16 20:35 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-17 0:17 ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-17 0:48 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-17 1:03 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-17 2:07 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-17 0:16 ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-16 20:43 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-16 21:41 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-17 13:51 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-17 19:52 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-18 4:59 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-18 5:16 ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-18 9:31 ` Pedro Alves
2009-09-18 14:37 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-18 14:57 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-18 16:42 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-22 0:46 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-22 22:49 ` [RFA/commit] s/nquery/query/ in record.c (was "Re: Another proposal for frontends and queries.") Joel Brobecker
2009-09-23 12:45 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-24 3:05 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-24 17:59 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='h8koka$oub$2@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=vladimir@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox