From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>,
Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>,
Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: Another proposal for frontends and queries.
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909161545.16634.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daef60380909160733g40e55ce4rabeae2500263f529@mail.gmail.com>
On Wednesday 16 September 2009 15:33:36, Hui Zhu wrote:
> Because it will delete the execution log follow this insn.
The user in the CLI still has to type an explicit 'y'
for that to happen. The default only applies when there's
no terminal. The right question to be asking is: what should
be the default answer in batch scripts.
Keep in mind that this all relates to the fact that there
is no "record status" command, that scripts and frontends
could use to query the record status, and be able to decide
upfront what to do, instead of gdb doing a query after the
fact. Last time I brought that up, it was agreed that it
would be a good thing to have. Anyone working on that?
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-16 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-14 2:38 Marc Khouzam
2009-09-14 6:45 ` Vladimir Prus
2009-09-14 13:07 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-14 14:09 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-14 14:28 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-14 14:48 ` Pedro Alves
2009-09-14 14:57 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-14 15:08 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-14 15:36 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-14 16:06 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-15 16:26 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-16 6:24 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-16 12:38 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-16 13:06 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-16 13:25 ` Pedro Alves
2009-09-16 13:46 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-16 13:59 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-16 14:17 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-16 14:26 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-16 14:34 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-16 14:45 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2009-09-16 14:43 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-16 18:03 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-16 23:36 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-16 23:40 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-16 17:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-09-14 15:23 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-16 20:20 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-16 20:35 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-17 0:17 ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-17 0:48 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-17 1:03 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-17 2:07 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-17 0:16 ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-16 20:43 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-16 21:41 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-17 13:51 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-17 19:52 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-18 4:59 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-18 5:16 ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-18 9:31 ` Pedro Alves
2009-09-18 14:37 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-18 14:57 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-18 16:42 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-22 0:46 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-22 22:49 ` [RFA/commit] s/nquery/query/ in record.c (was "Re: Another proposal for frontends and queries.") Joel Brobecker
2009-09-23 12:45 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-24 3:05 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-24 17:59 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200909161545.16634.pedro@codesourcery.com \
--to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=marc.khouzam@ericsson.com \
--cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
--cc=teawater@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox